BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of early neoplastic lesions of gastrointestinal tract. Lesions are lifted by submucosal fluid injection before circumferential incision and dissection. High-pressure fluid injection using water jet (WJ) technology is already used for lifting and dissection in surgery. The study was designed to assess WJ for ESD submucosal lifting and dissection. METHODS: An experimental, randomized comparative, "in vivo" nonsurvival animal study on 12 pigs was designed. Stomach mucosal areas were delineated and resected using three ESD techniques: technique A-syringe injection and IT knife dissection; technique B-WJ continuous injection and IT knife dissection; technique C-WJ injection and WJ pulsed dissection. Injection and dissection speeds and complications rates were assessed. RESULTS: Water jet continuous injection is faster than syringe injection (B faster than A, p = 0.001 and B nonsignificantly faster than C, p = 0.06). IT knife dissection is significantly faster after WJ continuous injection (B faster than A, p = 0.003). WJ pulsed dissection is significantly slower than IT knife dissection (C slower than A and B, both p < 0.001). The overall procedure speed was significantly higher and the immediate bleedings rate was significantly lower for technique B than A and C (overall procedure speed p = 0.001, immediate bleedings p = 0.032 and 0.038 respectively). There were no perforations with any technique. CONCLUSIONS: Water jet fluid continuous injection speeds up ESD, whereas pulsed WJ dissection does not.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of early neoplastic lesions of gastrointestinal tract. Lesions are lifted by submucosal fluid injection before circumferential incision and dissection. High-pressure fluid injection using water jet (WJ) technology is already used for lifting and dissection in surgery. The study was designed to assess WJ for ESD submucosal lifting and dissection. METHODS: An experimental, randomized comparative, "in vivo" nonsurvival animal study on 12 pigs was designed. Stomach mucosal areas were delineated and resected using three ESD techniques: technique A-syringe injection and IT knife dissection; technique B-WJ continuous injection and IT knife dissection; technique C-WJ injection and WJ pulsed dissection. Injection and dissection speeds and complications rates were assessed. RESULTS:Water jet continuous injection is faster than syringe injection (B faster than A, p = 0.001 and B nonsignificantly faster than C, p = 0.06). IT knife dissection is significantly faster after WJ continuous injection (B faster than A, p = 0.003). WJ pulsed dissection is significantly slower than IT knife dissection (C slower than A and B, both p < 0.001). The overall procedure speed was significantly higher and the immediate bleedings rate was significantly lower for technique B than A and C (overall procedure speed p = 0.001, immediate bleedings p = 0.032 and 0.038 respectively). There were no perforations with any technique. CONCLUSIONS:Water jet fluid continuous injection speeds up ESD, whereas pulsed WJ dissection does not.
Authors: Elizabeth Rajan; Christopher J Gostout; Arnaldo B Feitoza; Olga N Leontovich; Lori J Herman; Lawrence J Burgart; Sydney Chung; Peter B Cotton; Robert H Hawes; Anthony N Kalloo; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Pankaj J Pasricha Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: A Imagawa; H Okada; Y Kawahara; R Takenaka; J Kato; H Kawamoto; S Fujiki; R Takata; T Yoshino; Y Shiratori Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Joachim Oertel; Michael Robert Gaab; Andreas Knapp; Harald Essig; Rolf Warzok; Juergen Piek Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.654