| Literature DB >> 23467803 |
Mohamed Sabry1, Sunil K Halder, Abdou S Ait Allah, Eman Roshdy, Veera Rajaratnam, Ayman Al-Hendy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Currently there is no effective medicinal treatment for uterine fibroids (UFs), a common health disorder that affects women of reproductive age. Identification of modifiable risk factors such as vitamin D (Vit D) deficiency could help develop novel strategies for the prevention and/or treatment of UFs. The purpose of this study was to identify whether low serum Vit D3 levels correlate with increased risk of UFs.Entities:
Keywords: premenopausal women; race/ethnicity; risk factor; vitamin D deficiency
Year: 2013 PMID: 23467803 PMCID: PMC3589082 DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S38800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Womens Health ISSN: 1179-1411
Demographics of the study cohorts (n = 154)
| Participants | Ethnicity | Age [years] | BMI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Black | White | |||
| Cases (n = 104) | 61 | 43 | 37.1 ± 2.9 (NS) | 29.2 ± 4.3 (NS) |
| Controls (n = 50) | 26 | 24 | 36.8 ± 3.4 (NS) | 29.2 ± 4.3 (NS) |
| Total | 87 | 67 | – | – |
Notes:
The inclusion criteria for participants were premenopausal (menstrual cycle day 3 serum follicle-stimulating hormone < 10 mIU/mL) women aged between 18 and 50 years;
ethnicity of the participants was determined by self-report in clinical charts and BMI was evaluated upon participation in the study;
data presented as mean plus or minus standard deviation;
a P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant;
cases were participants who had at least one fibroid (minimum volume of 2 cm3), confirmed by transvaginal ultrasonography;
controls were participants who did not have any fibroids, confirmed by transvaginal ultrasonography.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; NS, not significant.
Figure 1Comparison of serum 25 (OH) vitamin D (Vit D) levels in uterine fibroid cases and healthy controls.
Notes: *Statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05). Total uterine fibroid cases, n = 104 (blacks = 61; whites = 43); total controls, n = 50 (blacks = 26; whites = 24).
Differences in serum vitamin D (Vit D) levelsa among study participants: blacks versus whitesb and casesc versus controlsd
| Participants | Serum Vit D levels (ng/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Blacks | Whites | Total (n = 154) | |
| Cases | 12.9 ± 5.0 (n = 61) | 24.45 ± 12.85 (n = 43) | 19.7 ± 11.8 (n = 104) |
| Controls | 18.30 ± 3.35 (n = 26) | 29.53 ± 8.13 (n = 24) | 22.3 ± 6.5 (n = 50) |
| Total (n = 154) | 14.2 ± 5.2 (n = 87) | 25.5 ± 12.2 (n = 67) | – |
Notes:
Serum Vit D levels were measured in blood samples of all consenting participants, by radioimmunoassay;
ethnicity of the participants was determined by self-identification in clinic records;
cases were participants who had at least one fibroid (minimum volume of 2 cm3), confirmed by transvaginal ultrasonography;
controls were participants who did not have any fibroids, confirmed by transvaginal ultrasonography;
data presented as mean plus or minus standard deviation;
P = 0.05 (statistically significant);
P = 0.052;
P = 0.01 (statistically significant);
P = 0.03 (statistically significant).
Figure 2Comparison of serum 25-(OH) vitamin D (Vit D) levels between cases and controls in different ethnic groups: Vit D levels in (A) blacksa and (B) whites.b
Notes:aUterine fibroid cases, n = 61; healthy controls, n = 26; buterine fibroid cases, n = 43; healthy controls, n = 24; *statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3Correlation of serum 25-(OH) vitamin D (Vit D) levels to uterine fibroid volume given as a logarithmic trend line.
Notes: Total fibroid cases, n = 104; *statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4Evaluating racial trend in the correlation between serum 25-(OH) vitamin D levels to uterine fibroid volume: logarithmic trend lines given for (A) blacka and (B) whiteb participants.
Notes:aFibroid cases, n = 61; bfibroid cases, n = 43; *statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05).