Literature DB >> 23467636

Inequities in access to biologic and synthetic DMARDs across 46 European countries.

Polina Putrik1, Sofia Ramiro, Tore K Kvien, Tuulikki Sokka, Milena Pavlova, Till Uhlig, Annelies Boonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated access to biologic and synthetic disease modifying drugs (bDMARDs and sDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) across Europe.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study at national level was performed in 49 European countries. A questionnaire was sent to one expert, addressing the number of approved and reimbursed bDMARDs and sDMARDs, prices and co-payments, as well as acceptability of bDMARDs (barriers). Data on socio-economic welfare (gross domestic product per capita (GDP), health expenditure, income) were retrieved from web-based sources. Data on health status of RA patients were retrieved from an observational study. Dimensions of access (availability, affordability and acceptability) were correlated with the country's welfare and RA health status.
RESULTS: In total, 46 countries (94%) participated. Six countries did not reimburse any of the five sDMARDs surveyed, and in ten countries no bDMARDs were reimbursed. While the price of annual treatment with an average sDMARD was never higher than GPD, the price of one year treatment with a bDMARD exceeded GPD in 26 countries. Perceived barriers for access to bDMARDs were mainly found among financial and administrative restrictions. All dimensions of access were positively correlated with the country's economic welfare (coefficients 0.69 to 0.86 for overall access scores).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA in lower income European countries have less access to bDMARDs and sDMARDs, with particularly striking unaffordability of bDMARDs in some of these countries. When accepting that sDMARDs and bDMARDs are equally needed across countries to treat RA, our data point to inequities in access to pharmacological treatment for RA in Europe.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DMARDs (biologic); DMARDs (synthetic); Health services research; Rheumatoid Arthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23467636     DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  106 in total

1.  Treating psoriatic arthritis to target: discordance between physicians and patients' assessment, non-adherence, and restricted access to drugs precluded therapy escalation in a real-world cohort.

Authors:  Manoela Fantinel Ferreira; Charles Lubianca Kohem; Ricardo Machado Xavier; Everton Abegg; Otavio Silveira Martins; Marcus Barg Resmini; Ariele Lima de Mello; Franciele de Almeida Menegat; Vanessa Hax; Andrese Aline Gasparin; Claiton Viegas Brenol; Nicole Pamplona Bueno de Andrade; Daniela Viecceli; João Carlos Tavares Brenol; Penélope Esther Palominos
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  [Biosimilars versus original biologics. Similarities and differences from development to approval].

Authors:  J Windisch
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Adherence of rheumatoid arthritis patients to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Natalia Mena-Vazquez; Sara Manrique-Arija; Lucía Yunquera-Romero; Inmaculada Ureña-Garnica; Marta Rojas-Gimenez; Carla Domic; Francisco Gabriel Jimenez-Nuñez; Antonio Fernandez-Nebro
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 4.  Treatment failure in inflammatory arthritis: time to think about syndemics?

Authors:  Elena Nikiphorou; Heidi Lempp; Brandon A Kohrt
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 5.  Biologic agents in rheumatology: unmet issues after 200 trials and $200 billion sales.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Fotini B Karassa; Eric Druyts; Kristian Thorlund; Edward J Mills
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  The burden of disease in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Till Uhlig; Rikke H Moe; Tore K Kvien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Characteristics and outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis patients who started biosimilar infliximab.

Authors:  Yoon-Kyoung Sung; Soo-Kyung Cho; Dam Kim; Soyoung Won; Chan-Bum Choi; So-Young Bang; Seung-Jae Hong; Hyoun Ah Kim; Eun-Mi Koh; Hye-Soon Lee; Chang-Hee Suh; Dae-Hyun Yoo; Sang-Cheol Bae
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 8.  Use of data from multiple registries in studying biologic discontinuation: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Kazuki Yoshida; Helga Radner; Arthur Kavanaugh; Yoon-Kyoung Sung; Sang-Cheol Bae; Mitsumasa Kishimoto; Kazuo Matsui; Masato Okada; Shigeto Tohma; Michael E Weinblatt; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 9.  Biosimilars in IBD: from theory to practice.

Authors:  Silvio Danese; Stefanos Bonovas; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 10.  Pharmacoeconomics of Biosimilars: What Is There to Gain from Them?

Authors:  Filipe C Araújo; João Gonçalves; João Eurico Fonseca
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.