Literature DB >> 23467618

Determinants of delivery practices among Afar pastoralists of Ethiopia.

Medhanit Getachew Mekonnen1, Kassahun Negash Yalew, Jemal Yesouf Umer, Muluken Melese.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In a previous qualitative study in Afar, it was reported that most mothers deliver at home, assisted by Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs). However, determinant factors of delivery practices in this region remain scarcely explored. The objective of this study was to elucidate these factors among the Afar community.
METHODS: This cross sectional study was conducted in April 2011 in zone 3 of Afar regional state, Ethiopia. Quantitative data were collected from 478 women who had given birth during the preceding one year.
RESULTS: Out of 478 interviewed mothers in urban/rural areas, 398 (83.3%) gave birth to the youngest child while at home; 370 (92.5%) were assisted by TBAs. Only 3.2% of them were assisted by Health Extension Workers/nurses in health posts or at home during delivery. We found an association between health facility delivery and ante-natal care (ANC) attendance (p<0.001), educational status (p<0.001) and occupation of the husband/wife (mother) and gravidity (p=0.003); but there was no association with the number of wives the husband had (p=0.566). In the adjusted model, ANC attendance and education status of mother were significantly associated with health facility delivery (p=0.036; p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Most deliveries in the study community took place at home. Educated mothers and ANC attending mothers have high tendency for health facility delivery. Programmes need to strengthen the capacities of mothers to attend ANC services, as well as build the capacity of Health Extension Workers (HEWs) and nurses working in health posts, in order to win the confidence of the community.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Traditional birth attendant; antenatal care; educated mother

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23467618      PMCID: PMC3587020     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pan Afr Med J


Background

More than 90% of maternal deaths in the world occur in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Asia, whilst women in northern Europe have a 1 in 4,000 likelihood of dying from pregnancy related causes. For those in Africa, the chance is 1 in 16 [1]. Most of these deaths occur because of distant health facilities; lack of transport; high cost of service for mothers and inadequate skilled attendants; poorly motivated staff; inadequate equipment and supplies; and weak referral systems [2]. In low and middle income countries, most deliveries take place at home without the assistance of trained attendants [3-5]. Although the annual maternal deaths decreased from 526,300 in 1980 to 342,900 in 2008, only 23 countries have met the Millennium Development Goal (MDG 5) [6]. The MDG 5 is to reduce maternal mortality ratio by 75 per cent by 2015 [7]. The World Health Organization indicated that each year about 3.7 million children die within the first 28 days and close to 9.7 million children die before their fifth birthday [8]. UNICEF stated that progress towards reaching MDG 4, the goal of reducing the under-five mortality rate by two thirds by 2015, is “insufficient” in the Middle East and North Africa, SSA and South Asia [9]. The burden of maternal mortality remains greatest in SSA [10]. Studies have shown that around 20 - 30% of neonatal deaths can be averted if deliveries are attended by skilled birth attendants [11]. Home deliveries are common in developing countries. Studies in some countries reported that home deliveries range from 16% in Mumbai (India), 22% in Senegal, 65% in Tanzania to 87.7% in Bangladesh [12-15]. The main reasons given by mothers for home deliveries is distance to health facilities [13, 14, 16, 17]; cost for medical care; delivery complications; low education level and absence of ANC [18, 19]. This study was designed to collect data on the rate of home delivery and the determining factors for institutional delivery, among women in rural and urban areas of zone 3 of Afar region.

Methods

Study area

This study was conducted in Zone 3 of the Afar regional state of Ethiopia. This Zone is divided into six districts namely Awash, Amibara, Birumodytu, Gewane, Dulessa and Argoba special districts. The total population of Afar regional state is 1,418,000 and the study zone population is nearly 200,000 [20]. Afar regional state is located in the eastern part of Ethiopia and lies in the East African Great Rift Valley. In the west it is bordered by Tigray, Amhara and Oromia regional states; in the south by Somali regional state; in the east by Djibouti and in the north by Eritrea. It is a semi-arid region and more than 90% of the population is pastoralist.

Study design and sample size

A cross-sectional design was employed for interviewing women, between the ages of 15 - 49 (reproductive age groups) who delivered within the last one year, on determinants of delivery practices. The sample size was calculated using Epi-Info version 3.3 for Windows for single proportion formula. Calculation was based on the assumption of Type I Error of 5%, reported delivery in health facilities of 12.9% (Afar Regional Health Bureau 2006/2007 report), and a designing effect of 3 with 5% non response rate. The total sample size was 502 women between the ages of 15 - 49 years. A three stage sampling strategy, that is, districts to kebele then household was used to reach the target population. Estimated household size in each district was obtained from the National Population and Housing census report. The number of women to be interviewed (502) was allocated equally to 4 districts; these districts were randomly selected out of 6 districts of the Zone. Then, 12 kebeles (smallest unit of public structure and possibly less than a village) were randomly selected in each district and the allocated households for the district were equally distributed amongst the kebeles (which amounted to about 11 mothers per kebele). In each selected kebele, the centre of the kebele was identified as the starting point and a bottle was spun to determine the direction to be followed. The survey then started from the nearest house to the direction of the bottle top, and continued in the determined direction. Households were surveyed sequentially until the desired number was obtained. All women in the age category of 15 - 49 years, from the sampled households, who gave birth during the last one year, were interviewed using the survey questionnaire. Data collectors who had previous experience of data collection were recruited and trained for two days on how to use the questionnaire. The questionnaire was initially developed in English and translated to Amharic for data collection and translated back to English. It was tested and finally all findings from the pre-test were incorporated into the final form of the questionnaire. To estimate the rural households’ asset levels, a wealth ranking was conducted, based on the following five categories, namely poorer (cows/oxen 0, camels 0, sheep/goats less than 5); poor (cows/oxen less than five, camels 0, sheep/goats between 5 - 9); middle (cows/oxen 5 - 9, camels 1 - 5, sheep/goats 10 - 19); rich (cows/oxen 10 - 29, camels 5 - 9, sheep/goats 20 - 49) and richer (cows/oxen 30 and above, camels 10 and above, sheep/goats 50 and above). During the data collection, the number of animals for each category was collected from the sampled households.

Data Quality Control and Analysis

During data collection, supervisors watched over the data collectors on site and every evening checked the data for accuracy, consistency and completeness. Supervisors also rechecked five percent of the samples in order to cross check the collected data. The data were entered and analyzed in SPSS software (version 16). The association between the socio-demographic and reproductive variables, ANC attendance and delivery place were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square test. Logistic regression analysis was also used to measure unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios to identify the predictors of health facility delivery. The asset level for the rural dwellers was calculated, taking the average market value of each category of the animal in Birr to get the total asset value of the household. However, during analysis it was found that the middle and rich categories were few; therefore for convenience of the analysis, the data was merged into rich and poor only. The richer, and the rich categories were merged into rich and the others were merged into poor.

Ethical Clearance

A written permit was obtained from Afar Regional Health Bureau and verbal consent from interviewed mothers.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

Out of the sampled 502 mothers who delivered during the last one year, 478 (95%) were interviewed. Out of all those interviewed, 347 (72.7%) belonged to the Afar ethnic group while Amhara accounted for 47 (9.8%); the rest, 83 (17.8%), belonged to various other groups. The majority of women, 468 (97.3%), were married and only 1.7% were single. The socio-demographic characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Characteristics of respondents for home and institutional delivery

CharacteristicsHome deliveryInstitutional deliveryPearson Chi-squarep-value
Women's Age 14.290.003
 15 – 18117
 19 – 2411430
 25 – 2911023
  ≥3016318
Gravidity/number of total pregnancies 18.390.031
 000
 17422
 27822
 37718
 45310
 5454
  ≥6622
Parity/number of living children 15.720.07
 000
 18324
 28020
 37919
 4519
 5454
  ≥6481
Number of wives a husband has 2.030.566
 134971
 2406
 370
 410
ANC attendants 26.3<0.001
 Yes23370
 No1608
Characteristics of respondents for home and institutional delivery

Delivery place

Out of the 478 mothers interviewed about the place of their last delivery, 398 (83.3%) had delivered at home and the remaining 16.7%) had delivered in health facilities. Among women who delivered at home 370 (92.5%) of them were assisted by TBAs and about 3.6% were assisted by Health Extension Workers/nurse; a further 3.2% were assisted by a neighbor. Out of all the reasons given as to why they preferred home deliveries, 205 (51.5%) of them said that it was because labour progressed fast and there was no time to reach a health facility. Cultural ceremonies surrounding home deliveries and lack of confidence in health facilities were not reasons for opting for home deliveries (Table 2).
Table 2

Socioeconomic characteristics of the respondents

CharacteristicsHome deliveryInstitutional deliveryPearson Chi-squarep-value
Educational Status of mother 41.67<0.001
 Cannot read and write32439
 Read and write only102
 Primary school 1 – 84315
 Secondary school 9 – 101612
 Higher education/university/college 10+46
Educational Status of husband 53.9<0.001
 Cannot read and write28524
 Read and write only278
 Primary school 1 – 83218
 Secondary school 9 – 103314
 Higher education/university/college 10+1512
Occupation of mother 180.003
 House wife35258
 Government/private employee2213
 Merchant52
 Pastoralist60
 Semi-pastoralist22
 Other113
Occupation of husband 58.4<0.001
 Farmer253
 Government/private employee1164
 Merchant455
 Pastoralist101
 Semi-pastoralist10153
 Daily labourer645
 Job less193
 Other144
Monthly Income (Birr) 24.25<0.001
 <50010016
 500-10004425
 1001-200047
 >200001
Socioeconomic characteristics of the respondents As shown in Table 2, there was an association between home delivery and age (p=0.003), educational status and occupation of the husband/wife (mother); p<0.001, and gravidity and parity (p<0.031), but there was no association with the number of wives the husband had (p>0.566). Out of 197 urban mothers interviewed, 49 (24.8%) of them had delivered in health facilities. Moreover, a higher economic status increased the likelihood of health facility delivery; p<0.001 (Table 2). There was no association between economic status and health facility delivery in the rural set up when the rural and urban income level data were analyzed separately viz a viz health facility delivery. Additionally, there was also an association between mothers’ educational status and health facility delivery (p<0.001). The choice of TBAs is mostly related to the emergency nature of deliveries. The reasons for mothers’ choice of health facility for their delivery were: fear of bad outcome for themselves and the fetus, 42 (45.7%); referral by TBAs, 19 (20.7%); referral by HEWs, 9 (9.8%) and previous risk of adverse outcome during home delivery 16 (17. 4%).

Antenatal Care (ANC) Practices

Of the 478 women who were asked about their ANC follow up for their last pregnancy, 305 (63.8%) had attended ANC at least once during their pregnancy. For those who did not attend ANC, 48 (50%), as described in Table 3, the main reason for not doing so was mainly related to distance of health facilities and a few, 12 (13%), reported that there was no advantage of ANC.
Table 3

Reasons given for home delivery

ReasonFrequency%
Labour too quick to reach health institution20551.51
Health facilities are too far6115.33
Home delivery is more comfortable5213.1
No transport266.53
Health workers are not friendly205.02
Home deliveries allow family and friends to attend the delivery123
Cost of medical services61.51
Health facilities are not clean20.5
Missing data143.5
Total 398 100.0
Reasons given for home delivery Most of the interviewed mothers, 425 (88.9%), reported that every pregnancy has a risk for the mother and the fetus. As shown in Table 4, there was a significant association between attending ANC and knowing the advantages of ANC (p<0.001), but there was no significant association between knowing pregnancy/delivery danger signs and ANC attendance (p>0.05), except for difficulty of breathing in pregnancy (p=0.03).
Table 4

The relationship between knowing risk factors of pregnancy/delivery and attending ante-natal care

CharacteristicsNumber% women who attended ANCPearson Chi- Squarep-Value
Advantages of ANC
 Assess maternal health37475.190.9<0.001
 Assess fetal health27277.949.8<0.001
 Assess fetal position18384.250.28<0.001
 Assess possible delivery complication11186.530.55<0.001
 No advantage922.27.180.007
 I don't know any advantage636.3106.9<0.001
 Other757.10.170.68
Danger signs of pregnancy/delivery
 Bleeding during pregnancy21568.42.360.124
 Fever14768.71.520.218
 Convulsion4772.31.340.247
 Difficulty in breathing3781.14.70.03
 High blood pressure1872.20.470.495
 Edema of hands and face10468.30.750.386
 Decreased/absent fetal movement1560.00.150.7
 Labour more than 12 hours5664.30.000.966
 I don't know5056.01.850.174
 Other4965.30.010.923
The relationship between knowing risk factors of pregnancy/delivery and attending ante-natal care Concerning the knowledge and skills of HEWs in conducting ANC, 269 (56.3%) of the mothers said that HEWs were superior to TBAs in terms of knowledge and skills; 96 (20.1%) said that TBAs were superior; 64 (13.4%) were not able to compare; 22 (4.6%) said that HEWs and TBAs were not different while 19 (4%) said HEWs could not conduct ANC.

Predictors of using health facility delivery

A logistic regression model was applied for variables which showed significant association. These variables were gravidity, age of mothers, ANC attendance, occupation and educational status of husband/wife. Education status of wife and ANC attendance among mothers showed significant association from all variables with p=0.036 and p<0.001 levels of significance respectively.

Discussion

Most mothers in the study community (83.3%) had delivered at home; less than 25% had delivered in health facilities. The main reason given for home deliveries was that the emergency nature of delivery did not allow the mothers to be transported to health facilities. Most mothers live in the rural areas far from health facilities, and there was no transport system. Studies in other countries have also reported similar findings, whereby distance plays the main part in determining health facility delivery [10, 13, 16, 17]. In this study, home ceremonies during delivery were not found to be determinant factors for home deliveries in this study. Traditional birth attendants are still the main attendants whilst there are HEWs and nurses in some of the study kebeles. The findings show that most mothers believe that HEWs are superior to TBAs in terms of skill; however, a significant proportion also prefers TBAs and some are even doubtful about the skills of HEWs. In a previous qualitative study in the same area, participants reported that they had no confidence in HEWs. The reason being that HEWs’ training is short; they are young and have not proven themselves like TBAs [21]. The difference in the reasons given between the two studies may be due to social desirability bias in the quantitative study. Considering that the data collectors came from the government, labeling HEWs as “lower than TBAs” may have been seen to be opposing the government initiative. This is an area which needs intervention in order for the community to develop confidence in HEWs assigned to health posts. One possibility is to bring the labouring mother to the health posts along with the TBA so that both the TBA and the HEWs can assist delivery together. This would give a better chance of a clean delivery at a health post and would enable a referral to be organized if the mother needs one. In this study, we found an association between ANC attendance and delivering in health facilities. In the urban areas, delivery is significantly associated with the income of the household, whilst it is not a factor for the rural. This is probably because in the rural settings, whether the mother has money or not, there is no transport and no time to take a labouring mother to health facilities. Again, as reported in our previous study, it was only when the mother failed to deliver at home that the community took her to a health facility (authors’ AMREF unpublished data). This does not require a lot of money, as it is a communal responsibility. In health facilities, delivery is free unless the mother needs to go to a referral hospital wherein the family would incur transport costs. Although there is an association between status of education and health facility delivery, ANC and knowing the advantage of ANC, there was no association between delivery in health facilities, and knowing the danger signs in pregnancy/ delivery [18, 19]. This could have been due to the distance of health facilities for most mothers as there was no chance even if they wanted to go because there was no transport system to take the mother to health facilities [12-14]. Thus, there is need to design an affordable and appropriate transport system for the area. Rickshaw ambulances can work for Afar as most of the area is flat. Rickshaws are cheap and their maintenance cost is low. The other option is to organize a camel-pulled cart. Ambulances that can be stationed in health centres to transport mothers from health centres to hospitals are crucial. Hospitals are more than 200 kilometres from the study areas. Based on the findings of this study, several recommendations can be made. The first recommendation is to teach mothers on the importance of ANC and institutional delivery. Along with this, developing the competence of HEWs and equipping health posts are important steps in bringing skilled birth attendance nearer to the community. TBAs are still much preferred by the community for good reasons. There is no way for HEWs to get the community's confidence over TBAs in the short term. We need to understand and communicate the concerns of the community. A middle ground strategy of encouraging TBAs to attend all deliveries in health posts, together with HEWs, should be designed. This way, clean delivery can be offered to the mothers. If the community ambulance system, as mentioned above, is attached to health posts, mothers with difficult labours can be referred in time to health centres. In the towns, deliveries still take place at home and there is need to educate the mothers. Ambulance service for health centres will facilitate the transportation of mothers to hospitals.

Conclusion

This study reports the rate of home delivery and the determinant factors of institutional delivery in Afar region. Majority of deliveries in the study area took place at home mainly assisted by TBAs. Knowledge of danger signs in pregnancy was insignificant for institutional delivery. However educated mothers and mothers who attended ANC had a higher tendency for health facility delivery. Therefore, there is need to educate mothers on the importance of ANC and institutional delivery. Additionally, developing the competence of HEWs and equipping health posts are important steps in bringing skilled birth attendance nearer to the community. As TBAs are still much preferred by the community for good reasons, it may be difficult for HEWs to get the community's confidence over TBAs in the short term. Importantly, the community's concerns should be communicated to local health system's stakeholders. A middle ground strategy of encouraging TBAs to attend all deliveries in health posts, together with HEWs, should be considered. This is likely to result in increased confidence among community members on health facility delivery; and in the long-term result in better maternal outcomes.
  13 in total

1.  Utilization of health facilities and trained birth attendants for childbirth in rural Bangladesh: an empirical study.

Authors:  Bimal Kanti Paul; Deborah J Rumsey
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Low use of rural maternity services in Uganda: impact of women's status, traditional beliefs and limited resources.

Authors:  Grace Bantebya Kyomuhendo
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2003-05

3.  Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980-2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5.

Authors:  Margaret C Hogan; Kyle J Foreman; Mohsen Naghavi; Stephanie Y Ahn; Mengru Wang; Susanna M Makela; Alan D Lopez; Rafael Lozano; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save?

Authors:  Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Simon Cousens; Taghreed Adam; Neff Walker; Luc de Bernis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Mar 12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why.

Authors:  Carine Ronsmans; Wendy J Graham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Home birth in women who have given birth at least once in a health facility: contributory factors in a developing country.

Authors:  Adama Faye; Mariama Niane; Ibrahim Ba
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Source of antenatal care influences facility delivery in rural Tanzania: a population-based study.

Authors:  Peter C Rockers; Mark L Wilson; Godfrey Mbaruku; Margaret E Kruk
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-09-23

8.  Prospective study of determinants and costs of home births in Mumbai slums.

Authors:  Sushmita Das; Ujwala Bapat; Neena Shah More; Latika Chordhekar; Wasundhara Joshi; David Osrin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Factors affecting home delivery in rural Tanzania.

Authors:  Mwifadhi Mrisho; Joanna A Schellenberg; Adiel K Mushi; Brigit Obrist; Hassan Mshinda; Marcel Tanner; David Schellenberg
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 10.  Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use.

Authors:  Sabine Gabrysch; Oona M R Campbell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  28 in total

1.  Spatial Distribution and Associated Factors of Institutional Delivery among Reproductive-Age Women in Ethiopia: The Case of Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey.

Authors:  Daniel Sisay; Helen Ali Ewune; Temesgen Muche; Wondwosen Molla
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2022-06-25

2.  Determinants of utilisation of antenatal care and skilled birth attendant at delivery in South West Shoa Zone, Ethiopia: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Calistus Wilunda; Gianluca Quaglio; Giovanni Putoto; Risa Takahashi; Federico Calia; Desalegn Abebe; Fabio Manenti; Donata Dalla Riva; Ana Pilar Betrán; Andrea Atzori
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Social Capital as a Determinant of Pregnant Mother's Place of Delivery: Experience from Kongwa District in Central Tanzania.

Authors:  Innocent Antony Semali; Germana Henry Leyna; Elia John Mmbaga; Anna Tengia-Kessy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Why do women deliver at home? Multilevel modeling of Ethiopian National Demographic and Health Survey data.

Authors:  Henock Yebyo; Mussie Alemayehu; Alemayehu Kahsay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Determinants of institutional delivery service utilization among pastorals of Liben Zone, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia, 2015.

Authors:  Nejimu Biza Zepro; Ahmed Tahir Ahmed
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-12-09

6.  The influence of maternal health education on the place of delivery in conflict settings of Darfur, Sudan.

Authors:  Izzeldin F Adam
Journal:  Confl Health       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.723

Review 7.  Antenatal care as a means of increasing birth in the health facility and reducing maternal mortality: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yifru Berhan; Asres Berhan
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2014-09

8.  A meta-analysis of socio-demographic factors predicting birth in health facility.

Authors:  Yifru Berhan; Asres Berhan
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2014-09

9.  Reasons for Preference of Home Delivery with Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) in Rural Bangladesh: A Qualitative Exploration.

Authors:  Bidhan Krishna Sarker; Musfikur Rahman; Tawhidur Rahman; Jahangir Hossain; Laura Reichenbach; Dipak Kumar Mitra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Factors associated with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Alemi Kebede; Kalkidan Hassen; Aderajew Nigussie Teklehaymanot
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.