Literature DB >> 23466351

Differential effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on arm position sense in right- vs. left-handers.

Lena Schmidt1, Frank Artinger, Oliver Stumpf, Georg Kerkhoff.   

Abstract

The human brain is organized asymmetrically in two hemispheres with different functional specializations. Left- and right-handers differ in many functional capacities and their anatomical representations. Right-handers often show a stronger functional lateralization than left-handers, the latter showing a more bilateral, symmetrical brain organization. Recent functional imaging evidence shows a different lateralization of the cortical vestibular system towards the side of the preferred hand in left- vs. right-handers as well. Since the vestibular system is involved in somatosensory processing and the coding of body position, vestibular stimulation should affect such capacities differentially in left- vs. right-handers. In the present, sham-stimulation-controlled study we explored this hypothesis by studying the effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on proprioception in both forearms in left- and right-handers. Horizontal arm position sense (APS) was measured with an opto-electronic device. Second, the polarity-specific online- and after-effects of subsensory, bipolar GVS on APS were investigated in different sessions separately for both forearms. At baseline, both groups did not differ in their unsigned errors for both arms. However, right-handers showed significant directional errors in APS of both arms towards their own body. Right-cathodal/left-anodal GVS, resulting in right vestibular cortex activation, significantly deteriorated left APS in right-handers, but had no detectable effect on APS in left-handers in either arm. These findings are compatible with a right-hemisphere dominance for vestibular functions in right-handers and a differential vestibular organization in left-handers that compensates for the disturbing effects of GVS on APS. Moreover, our results show superior arm proprioception in left-handers in both forearms.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23466351     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  9 in total

1.  Perceived finger orientation is biased towards functional task spaces.

Authors:  Lindsey E Fraser; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of age, sex and arm on the precision of arm position sense-left-arm superiority in healthy right-handers.

Authors:  Lena Schmidt; Lena Depper; Georg Kerkhoff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  The effect of hand position on perceived finger orientation in left- and right-handers.

Authors:  Lindsey E Fraser; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Balancing body ownership: Visual capture of proprioception and affectivity during vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Sonia Ponzo; Louise P Kirsch; Aikaterini Fotopoulou; Paul M Jenkinson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Where is my hand in space? The internal model of gravity influences proprioception.

Authors:  Maria Gallagher; Breanne Kearney; Elisa Raffaella Ferrè
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.812

6.  Composite body movements modulate numerical cognition: evidence from the motion-numerical compatibility effect.

Authors:  Xiaorong Cheng; Hui Ge; Deljfina Andoni; Xianfeng Ding; Zhao Fan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-05

7.  Postural Effects of Vestibular Manipulation Depend on the Physical Activity Status.

Authors:  Julien Maitre; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The disappearing hand: vestibular stimulation does not improve hand localisation.

Authors:  Luzia Grabherr; Leslie N Russek; Valeria Bellan; Mohammad Shohag; Danny Camfferman; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Effects of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation During a Bimanual Tracking Robotic Task.

Authors:  Bulmaro A Valdés; Carlo Menon
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.