Literature DB >> 23465969

Quantitative measurement of humero-acromial, humero-coracoid, and coraco-clavicular intervals for the diagnosis of subacromial and subcoracoid impingement of shoulder joint.

Baki Hekimoğlu1, Hasan Aydın, Volkan Kızılgöz, Idil Güneş Tatar, Onder Ersan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the acromio-humeral, coraco-humeral, and coraco-clavicular distances with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of shoulder impingement syndrome. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All the acromio-humeral, coraco-humeral, and coraco-clavicular intervals of all patients were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 132 shoulders (76 right and 56 left shoulders) with impingement syndrome (40 males and 92 females, with 79 cases surgically confirmed and the remaining 53 cases clinically and radiologically suspected) and 40 control group patients were included. Statistical correlation of this research was assessed by Fisher's Exact t test and Pearson chi-square test-correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: In the correlation of average acromio-humeral, coraco-humeral, and coraco-clavicular intervals (AHI, CHI, and CCI, respectively), there were significant statistical differences between patient and control groups; all the intervals were found to be higher in the control group. A moderate positive relation between average AHI and CHI, between AHI and CCI, and between CCI and CHI has been found. All intervals in the patient group increase or decrease dependently on each other. No proper cut-off values were determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve for all intervals between patient and control groups.
CONCLUSION: Acromio-humeral, coraco-humeral, and coraco-clavicular intervals were extremely lower in the shoulder impingement syndrome and had significant importance in the diagnosis of subacromial and subcoracoid impingements.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23465969     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  7 in total

1.  Subcoracoid impingement and subscapularis tendon: is there any truth?

Authors:  Leonardo Osti; Francesco Soldati; Angelo Del Buono; Leo Massari
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2013-07-09

2.  Shoulder impingement syndrome: a systematic review of clinical trial participant selection criteria.

Authors:  Amy R Watts; Ben Williams; Susan W Kim; Donald C Bramwell; Jeganath Krishnan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-08-20

3.  In vivo measurements of glenohumeral distraction technique performed in three different joint positions.

Authors:  Diego Guerra-Rodríguez; Liliana Rozo; Daniel Basilio; Juan Guerrero-Henriquez
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-03-25

4.  Is coracohumeral distance associated with pain-function, and shoulder range of movement, in chronic anterior shoulder pain?

Authors:  S Navarro-Ledesma; F Struyf; M T Labajos-Manzanares; M Fernandez-Sanchez; A Luque-Suarez
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Anatomic Study of Subcoracoid Morphology in 418 Shoulders: Potential Implications for Subcoracoid Impingement.

Authors:  Anthony J Dugarte; Rocklend J Davis; T Sean Lynch; Mark S Schickendantz; Lutul D Farrow
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-16

6.  Radiological Variabilities in Subcoracoid Impingement: Coracoid Morphology, Coracohumeral Distance, Coracoglenoid Angle, and Coracohumeral Angle.

Authors:  Neşe Asal; Mehmet Hamdi Şahan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-11-30

7.  Do coracohumeral interval and glenoid version play a role in subscapularis tears?

Authors:  Silvampatti Ramasamy Sundararajan; Joseph Babu Joseph; Rajagopalakrishnan Ramakanth; Amit Kumar Jha; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-08-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.