Literature DB >> 23465763

Minimal clinically important differences in the edmonton symptom assessment system: the anchor is key.

David Hui, Eduardo Bruera.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23465763     DOI： 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN： 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments.

Authors:  David Hui; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Minimal clinically important differences in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in cancer patients: A prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  David Hui; Omar Shamieh; Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Pedro Emilio Perez-Cruz; Jung Hye Kwon; Mary Ann Muckaden; Minjeong Park; Sriram Yennu; Jung Hun Kang; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Which treatment is better? Ascertaining patient preferences with crossover randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  David Hui; Donna S Zhukovsky; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Reply to minimal clinically important difference and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale.

Authors:  David Hui; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Personalized Symptom Goals and Patient Global Impression on Clinical Changes in Advanced Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sebastiano Mercadante; Claudio Adile; Gaetano Lanzetta; Kyriaki Mystakidou; Marco Maltoni; Luiz Guilherme Soares; Stefano De Santis; Patrizia Ferrera; Marco Valenti; Marta Rosati; Romina Rossi; Andrea Cortegiani; Francesco Masedu; Franco Marinangeli; Federica Aielli
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-05-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.