BACKGROUND: To determine the anatomic extent of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP), knowledge about the topography of lymph node (LN) metastases is required. OBJECTIVE: Because small-volume LN metastases may be missed by standard histopathologic examination, we performed an anatomic mapping study combining molecular and histopathologic LN examination in PCa patients treated with RP and extended PLND (ePLND). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 52 patients with intermediate- (n=15) and high-risk (n=37) PCa underwent RP and ePLND without neoadjuvant treatment. ePLND included dissection of the obturator fossa and the external, internal, and common iliac vessels. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: LNs ≥3 mm in diameter were analysed by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) expression and by standard histopathology. Topography of positive LNs was determined descriptively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 1469 dissected LNs (median: 27 LNs per patient), 1186 LNs were ≥3 mm. Molecular LN analysis was positive in 127 LNs of 27 patients (52%) including 32 LNs of 12 patients (23%) with histopathologic positive LNs. Molecular examination was negative in 3 of 35 histopathologic positive LNs (9%). Combining both molecular and histopathologic findings, positive LNs were located in the standard PLND field defined by obturator fossa and external iliac vessels in 71%, along the internal iliac vessels in 16%, and along the common iliac vessels in 13%. Of LN-positive patients, 63% had LN metastases outside the standard PLND field. The internal iliac field was involved in 48% and the common iliac field in 37% of node-positive patients. Notably, internal and common iliac vessels were the only positive regions in 7% and 11% of node-positive patients, respectively. A limitation is the small number of patients included. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underline the enhanced sensitivity of qRT-PCR in comparison with standard histopathology for detection of small-volume LN metastases in PCa patients. Our results support an ePLND including the common iliac vessels, at least up to the ureteral crossing, to optimise nodal staging and to remove LNs potentially harbouring metastases.
BACKGROUND: To determine the anatomic extent of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP), knowledge about the topography of lymph node (LN) metastases is required. OBJECTIVE: Because small-volume LN metastases may be missed by standard histopathologic examination, we performed an anatomic mapping study combining molecular and histopathologic LN examination in PCa patients treated with RP and extended PLND (ePLND). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 52 patients with intermediate- (n=15) and high-risk (n=37) PCa underwent RP and ePLND without neoadjuvant treatment. ePLND included dissection of the obturator fossa and the external, internal, and common iliac vessels. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: LNs ≥3 mm in diameter were analysed by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) expression and by standard histopathology. Topography of positive LNs was determined descriptively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 1469 dissected LNs (median: 27 LNs per patient), 1186 LNs were ≥3 mm. Molecular LN analysis was positive in 127 LNs of 27 patients (52%) including 32 LNs of 12 patients (23%) with histopathologic positive LNs. Molecular examination was negative in 3 of 35 histopathologic positive LNs (9%). Combining both molecular and histopathologic findings, positive LNs were located in the standard PLND field defined by obturator fossa and external iliac vessels in 71%, along the internal iliac vessels in 16%, and along the common iliac vessels in 13%. Of LN-positive patients, 63% had LN metastases outside the standard PLND field. The internal iliac field was involved in 48% and the common iliac field in 37% of node-positive patients. Notably, internal and common iliac vessels were the only positive regions in 7% and 11% of node-positive patients, respectively. A limitation is the small number of patients included. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underline the enhanced sensitivity of qRT-PCR in comparison with standard histopathology for detection of small-volume LN metastases in PCa patients. Our results support an ePLND including the common iliac vessels, at least up to the ureteral crossing, to optimise nodal staging and to remove LNs potentially harbouring metastases.
Authors: Sujun Chen; Guanghui Zhu; Yue Yang; Fubo Wang; Yu-Tian Xiao; Na Zhang; Xiaojie Bian; Yasheng Zhu; Yongwei Yu; Fei Liu; Keqin Dong; Javier Mariscal; Yin Liu; Fraser Soares; Helen Loo Yau; Bo Zhang; Weidong Chen; Chao Wang; Dai Chen; Qinghua Guo; Zhengfang Yi; Mingyao Liu; Michael Fraser; Daniel D De Carvalho; Paul C Boutros; Dolores Di Vizio; Zhou Jiang; Theodorus van der Kwast; Alejandro Berlin; Song Wu; Jianhua Wang; Housheng Hansen He; Shancheng Ren Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Matthias M Heck; Michael Souvatzoglou; Margitta Retz; Roman Nawroth; Hubert Kübler; Tobias Maurer; Mark Thalgott; Bettina M Gramer; Gregor Weirich; Ina-Christine Rondak; Ernst J Rummeny; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend; Bernd Krause; Matthias Eiber Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Tibor Vag; Matthias M Heck; Ambros J Beer; Michael Souvatzoglou; Gregor Weirich; Konstantin Holzapfel; Ernst J Rummeny; Markus Schwaiger; Bernd Joachim Krause; Matthias Eiber Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Alexander Winter; Thomas Kneib; Clara Wasylow; Lena Reinhardt; Rolf-Peter Henke; Svenja Engels; Holger Gerullis; Friedhelm Wawroschek Journal: J Cancer Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: Dean Markić; Romano Oguić; Kristian Krpina; Ivan Vukelić; Gordana Đorđević; Iva Žuža; Josip Španjol Journal: Acta Clin Croat Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 0.780