BACKGROUND: Graphical Statistical Process Control (SPC) tools have been shown to promptly identify significant variations in clinical outcomes in a range of health care settings. We explored the application of these techniques to quantitatively inform the routine cardiac surgical (CAS) morbidity and mortality (M&M) review processes at a single site. METHODS: Baseline clinical and procedural data relating to 5265 consecutive cardiac surgical procedures, performed at St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital (SAWMH) between the 1st January 2003 and the 30th April 2012, were retrospectively evaluated. A range of appropriate clinical outcome indicators (COIs) were developed and evaluated using a combination of Cumulative Sum charts, Exponentially Weighted Moving Average charts and Funnel Plots. Charts were updated regularly and discussed at the cardiac surgery unit's bi-monthly M&M meetings. Risk adjustment (RA) for the COIs was developed and validated for incorporation into the charts to improve monitoring performance. RESULTS: Discrete and aggregated measures, including blood product/reoperation, major acute post-procedural complications, cardiopulmonary bypass duration and Length of Stay/Readmission < 28 days have proved to be valuable measures for monitoring outcomes. Instances of variation in performance identified using the charts were examined thoroughly and could be related to changes in clinical practice (e.g. antifibrinolytic use) as well as differences in individual operator performance (in some instances, driven by case mix). CONCLUSIONS: SPC tools can promptly detect meaningful changes in clinical outcome thereby allowing early intervention to address altered performance. Careful interpretation of charts for group and individual operators has proven helpful in detecting and differentiating systemic versus individual variation.
BACKGROUND: Graphical Statistical Process Control (SPC) tools have been shown to promptly identify significant variations in clinical outcomes in a range of health care settings. We explored the application of these techniques to quantitatively inform the routine cardiac surgical (CAS) morbidity and mortality (M&M) review processes at a single site. METHODS: Baseline clinical and procedural data relating to 5265 consecutive cardiac surgical procedures, performed at St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital (SAWMH) between the 1st January 2003 and the 30th April 2012, were retrospectively evaluated. A range of appropriate clinical outcome indicators (COIs) were developed and evaluated using a combination of Cumulative Sum charts, Exponentially Weighted Moving Average charts and Funnel Plots. Charts were updated regularly and discussed at the cardiac surgery unit's bi-monthly M&M meetings. Risk adjustment (RA) for the COIs was developed and validated for incorporation into the charts to improve monitoring performance. RESULTS: Discrete and aggregated measures, including blood product/reoperation, major acute post-procedural complications, cardiopulmonary bypass duration and Length of Stay/Readmission < 28 days have proved to be valuable measures for monitoring outcomes. Instances of variation in performance identified using the charts were examined thoroughly and could be related to changes in clinical practice (e.g. antifibrinolytic use) as well as differences in individual operator performance (in some instances, driven by case mix). CONCLUSIONS: SPC tools can promptly detect meaningful changes in clinical outcome thereby allowing early intervention to address altered performance. Careful interpretation of charts for group and individual operators has proven helpful in detecting and differentiating systemic versus individual variation.
Authors: Sneha Rajiv Jain; Wilson Sim; Cheng Han Ng; Yip Han Chin; Wen Hui Lim; Nicholas L Syn; Nur Haidah Bte Ahmad Kamal; Mehek Gupta; Valerie Heong; Xiao Wen Lee; Nur Sabrina Sapari; Xue Qing Koh; Zul Fazreen Adam Isa; Lucius Ho; Caitlin O'Hara; Arvindh Ulagapan; Shi Yu Gu; Kashyap Shroff; Rei Chern Weng; Joey S Y Lim; Diana Lim; Brendan Pang; Lai Kuan Ng; Andrea Wong; Ross Andrew Soo; Wei Peng Yong; Cheng Ean Chee; Soo-Chin Lee; Boon-Cher Goh; Richie Soong; David S P Tan Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Ridwan A Sanusi; Lin Yan; Amani F Hamad; Olawale F Ayilara; Viktoriya Vasylkiv; Mohammad Jafari Jozani; Shantanu Banerji; Joseph Delaney; Pingzhao Hu; Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Lisa M Lix Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-04-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Reema Harrison; Reece Amr Hinchcliff; Elizabeth Manias; Steven Mears; David Heslop; Victoria Walton; Ru Kwedza Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 2.655