Literature DB >> 2346519

Measurement of increases in anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels as a predictor of disease exacerbation in systemic lupus erythematosus. A long-term, prospective study.

E J ter Borg1, G Horst, E J Hummel, P C Limburg, C G Kallenberg.   

Abstract

To evaluate the predictive power of changes in levels of antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) as a predictor of disease exacerbations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we performed a prospective study on 72 unselected patients with SLE (mean duration of study 18.5 months, range 6-35 months). Patients were seen at least once every 3 months, and disease activity was scored according to a specific protocol. Plasma samples were obtained at least once every month and were assessed for anti-dsDNA antibody (by the Crithidia luciliae assay, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], and the Farr assay) and for complement components C3 and C4. Twenty-seven of 33 disease exacerbations observed during the study period were accompanied by a positive test result for anti-dsDNA antibody (27 by the Farr assay, 19 by the C luciliae assay, and 23 by the ELISA). Twenty-four of these exacerbations were preceded by a significant increase in anti-dsDNA antibody levels (23 by the Farr assay, 12 by the C luciliae assay, and 17 by the ELISA). The first observance of a significant increase in anti-dsDNA antibody levels preceded the exacerbation by 8-10 weeks. Significant increases in anti-dsDNA antibody levels not followed by an exacerbation were observed in 5 cases by the Farr assay, in 7 cases by the C luciliae assay, and in 3 cases by the ELISA; however, in 3 cases, 2 cases, and 1 case, respectively, these increases were followed by an increase in disease activity that did not fulfill the criteria for an exacerbation. Serial measurement of anti-dsDNA antibody levels was more sensitive for predicting exacerbations than was measurement of C3 and/or C4 levels (P less than 0.03). Serial assessment of anti-dsDNA antibody levels, especially by the Farr assay, is a sensitive and reasonably specific method for predicting disease exacerbations in SLE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2346519     DOI: 10.1002/art.1780330505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  143 in total

Review 1.  Rheumatology: 2. What laboratory tests are needed?

Authors:  K Shojania
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-04-18       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  The use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of SLE.

Authors:  W Egner
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  A human anti-dsDNA monoclonal antibody caused hyaline thrombi formation in kidneys of 'leaky' SCID mice.

Authors:  L J Mason; C T Ravirajan; D S Latchman; D A Isenberg
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  The role of somatic mutation in determining the affinity of anti-DNA antibodies.

Authors:  M Behrendt; L J Partridge; B Griffiths; M Goodfield; M Snaith; N J Lindsey
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Complement as a source of biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Chau-Ching Liu; Joseph M Ahearn; Susan Manzi
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Belimumab reduces autoantibodies, normalizes low complement levels, and reduces select B cell populations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  William Stohl; Falk Hiepe; Kevin M Latinis; Mathew Thomas; Morton A Scheinberg; Ann Clarke; Cynthia Aranow; Frank R Wellborne; Carlos Abud-Mendoza; Douglas R Hough; Lilia Pineda; Thi-Sau Migone; Z John Zhong; William W Freimuth; W Winn Chatham
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-07

7.  Myth and reality: practical test system for the measurement of anti-DNA antibodies in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Authors:  Laura J McCloskey; Paul Christner; Dana Jacobs-Kosmin; Troy D Jaskowski; Harry R Hill; Gabriella Lakos; Marius Teodorescu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Pharmacodynamics of recombinant human DNase I in serum.

Authors:  W S Prince; D L Baker; A H Dodge; A E Ahmed; R W Chestnut; D V Sinicropi
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 9.  Autoantibody-dependent and autoantibody-independent roles for B cells in systemic lupus erythematosus: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Noam Jacob; William Stohl
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.815

10.  Assessment of lupus: where are we now?

Authors:  E Hay; C Gordon; P Emery
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.