Literature DB >> 23464955

Clavicular length: the assumption of symmetry.

Brian P Cunningham1, Alex McLaren, Michael Richardson, Ryan McLemore.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown subjectively worse outcomes associated with 15 to 20 mm of clavicle shortening. As a result, more than 15 mm of shortening has become a relative indication for operative management. Various methods to quantify shortening have been described in the literature. All measurement techniques described assume clavicular symmetry to assess clavicular shortening. The goal of this study was to assess the side-to-side variation in clavicle length in uninjured, skeletally mature adults.Clavicle length in 102 skeletally mature adults (age range, 22-91 years) was measured using computed tomography data. Clavicle length was defined as the distance between the lateral-most point of the clavicle in the acromioclavicular joint and the medial-most point of the clavicle in the sternoclavicular joint. The side-to-side difference in clavicular length was analyzed, and patients were organized into 2 groups: group 1 was symmetric (difference of less than 5 mm), and group 2 was asymmetric (difference of more than 5 mm). Mean difference in clavicle length for all patients was 4.25±3.8 mm (range, 0-23 mm). Clavicular symmetry was found in 73 (71.5%) of 102 patients. The remaining 29 patients had asymmetry greater than 5 mm. Asymmetry greater than 10 mm was found in 7 (7%) of 102 patients. Twenty-eight percent of clavicles were asymmetric, whereas 7% had clinically significant asymmetry that could affect treatment decisions.This finding calls into question previous methods developed to assess clavicular length in the setting of trauma because of the assumption of symmetry. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of hand dominance and pediatric trauma on this observation. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23464955     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130222-24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  10 in total

1.  Plain film measurement error in acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Lori Anne Archer; Stephen Hunt; Daniel Squire; Carl Moores; Craig Stone; Frank O'Dea; Andrew Furey
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Posttraumatic midshaft clavicular shortening does not result in relevant functional outcome changes.

Authors:  Sylvia A Stegeman; Pieter Bas de Witte; Sjoerd Boonstra; Jurriaan H de Groot; Jochem Nagels; Pieta Krijnen; Inger B Schipper
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Bone shortening of clavicular fractures: comparison of measurement methods.

Authors:  A H Thorsmark; P Muhareb Udby; I Ban; L H Frich
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  Does clavicular shortening after nonoperative treatment of midshaft fractures affect shoulder function? A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Woltz; Alysia Sengab; Pieta Krijnen; Inger B Schipper
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Quantifying shortening of the fractured clavicle assuming clavicular symmetry is unreliable.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Anand Appalsamy; Sebastiaan Franken; Albert van Kampen; Gerjon Hannink
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Can 3D-printing avoid discomfort-related implant removal in midshaft clavicle fractures? A four-year follow-up.

Authors:  Rob F M van Doremalen; Rens A van der Linde; Jan J Kootstra; Sven H van Helden; Edsko E G Hekman
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Three-dimensional reconstruction and virtual reposition of fragments compared to two dimensional measurements of midshaft clavicle fracture shortening.

Authors:  Mehmet Öztürk; Emilie Paulin; Caecilia Charbonnier; Elise Dupuis-Lozeron; Nicolas Holzer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Reliability of measurements of the fractured clavicle: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Gerjon Hannink; Arnoud R van Geene; Albert van Kampen
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-03

9.  Midshaft clavicle fractures: Current concepts.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Peter van Schie; Michel Pj van den Bekerom
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-06-20

10.  Influence of radiographic projection and patient positioning on shortening of the fractured clavicle.

Authors:  Paul Hoogervorst; Arnoud van Geene; Udo Gundlach; Abel Wei; Nico Verdonschot; Gerjon Hannink
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.