Literature DB >> 23464949

Stable, dependable fixation of short-stem femoral implants at 5 years.

Ronak M Patel1, Winifred M Lo, Max A Cayo, Mark M Dolan, S David Stulberg.   

Abstract

Conventional uncemented femoral implants provide dependable long-term fixation in patients with a wide range of clinical function. However, challenges with proximal-distal femoral mismatch, preservation of bone stock, and minimally invasive approaches have led to exploration into various other implant designs. Short-stem designs focusing on a stable metaphyseal fit have emerged to address these challenges in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to present the 5-year clinical and radiographic results of a computed tomography-based, custom-made, metaphyseal-engaging short-stem femoral implant.Sixty-one patients with an average age of 61 years (range, 22-75 years) and average body mass index of 28.9 kg/m(2) (range, 20.3-44.1 kg/m(2)) at follow-up underwent 69 THAs with the metaphyseal-engaging short stem. Clinical performance was evaluated using the Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score, and radiographs were reviewed for stability and bony ingrowth. Harris Hip Score averaged 55 (range, 20-90) preoperatively and 96 (range, 55-100) postoperatively. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score averaged 51 (range, 13-80) preoperatively and 3 (range, 0-35) postoperatively. No cases of subsidence were observed, and no revision surgeries were performed. Bone remodeling was typified by endosteal condensation and cortical hypertrophy in Gruen zones 2, 3, 5, and 6. At 5-year follow-up, the uncemented, metaphyseal-engaging short stem was stable and exhibited proximal bone remodeling closer to the metaphysis than conventional stems. Short-stem, metaphyseal-engaging femoral implants can meet the goals of a successful THA. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23464949     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130222-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  11 in total

1.  Two- to 4-Year Followup of a Short Stem THA Construct: Excellent Fixation, Thigh Pain a Concern.

Authors:  Richard L Amendola; Devon D Goetz; Steve S Liu; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Do sex and BMI predict or does stem design prevent muscle damage in anterior supine minimally invasive THA?

Authors:  Benjamin M Frye; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The learning curve following adoption of a novel short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implications on short-term patient outcomes.

Authors:  Jorge A Padilla; Afshin A Anoushiravani; James E Feng; Ran Schwarzkopf; James Slover; Scott Marwin
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-06

4.  Early perioperative complication rates and subsidence with the Tribute® short cementless, tapered stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John Attenello; Sean Chan; Kelvin Naito; Michele Saruwatari; Sean Saito; Samantha Andrews; Cass Nakasone
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-01-17

5.  Outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty using 3D image-based custom stems in unselected patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Nogier; I Tourabaly; S Ramos-Pascual; J H Müller; M Saffarini; C Courtin
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-12-10

6.  Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Short-term clinical and radiological results of two different design metaphyseal fitting femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  I Tatani; K Solou; A Panagopoulos; J Lakoumentas; A Kouzelis; P Megas
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shao-Chuan Huo; Fan Wang; Lu-Jue Dong; Wei Wei; Jing-Qi Zeng; Hong-Xing Huang; Qing-Min Han; Rui-Qi Duan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Small Stems for Big Challenges.

Authors:  Phillip A Bostian; Brian T Grisez; Adam E Klein; Benjamin M Frye
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-03-23

10.  Are short-stem prostheses superior to conventional stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Hao-Dong Liang; Wei-Yi Yang; Jian-Ke Pan; He-Tao Huang; Ming-Hui Luo; Ling-Feng Zeng; Jun Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.