Literature DB >> 23463703

Tissue growth into three-dimensional composite scaffolds with controlled micro-features and nanotopographical surfaces.

Elnaz Tamjid1, Arash Simchi, John W C Dunlop, Peter Fratzl, Reza Bagheri, Manouchehr Vossoughi.   

Abstract

Controlling topographic features at all length scales is of great importance for the interaction of cells with tissue regenerative materials. We utilized an indirect three-dimensional printing method to fabricate polymeric scaffolds with pre-defined and controlled external and internal architecture that had an interconnected structure with macro- (400-500 μm) and micro- (∼25 μm) porosity. Polycaprolactone (PCL) was used as model system to study the kinetics of tissue growth within porous scaffolds. The surface of the scaffolds was decorated with TiO2 and bioactive glass (BG) nanoparticles to the better match to nanoarchitecture of extracellular matrix (ECM). Micrometric BG particles were also used to reveal the effect of particle size on the cell behavior. Observation of tissue growth and enzyme activity on two-dimensional (2D) films and three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds showed effects of nanoparticle inclusion and of surface curvature on the cellular adhesion, proliferation, and kinetics of preosteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1) tissue growth into the pore channels. It was found that the presence of nanoparticles in the substrate impaired cellular adhesion and proliferation in 3D structures. Evaluation of alkaline phosphate activity showed that the presence of the hard particles affects differentiation of the cells on 2D films. Notwithstanding, the effect of particles on cell differentiation was not as strong as that seen by the curvature of the substrate. We observed different effects of nanofeatures on 2D structures with those of 3D scaffolds, which influence the cell proliferation and differentiation for non-load-bearing applications in bone regenerative medicine.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley Company.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MC3T3-E1; bone regenerating materials; mechanical properties; nanocomposite; scaffolds; tissue growth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23463703     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  10 in total

Review 1.  Applications of nanotechnology in 3D printed tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Noah Z Laird; Timothy M Acri; Jaidev L Chakka; Juliana C Quarterman; Walla I Malkawi; Satheesh Elangovan; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.589

2.  Poly(ε-caprolactone) Scaffolds Fabricated by Melt Electrospinning for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Sascha Zaiss; Toby D Brown; Johannes C Reichert; Arne Berner
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Impact of Four Protein Additives in Cryogels on Osteogenic Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Victor Häussling; Sebastian Deninger; Laura Vidoni; Helen Rinderknecht; Marc Ruoß; Christian Arnscheidt; Kiriaki Athanasopulu; Ralf Kemkemer; Andreas K Nussler; Sabrina Ehnert
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-07

4.  3D multiphoton lithography using biocompatible polymers with specific mechanical properties.

Authors:  Boris Buchroithner; Delara Hartmann; Sandra Mayr; Yoo Jin Oh; Dmitry Sivun; Andreas Karner; Bianca Buchegger; Thomas Griesser; Peter Hinterdorfer; Thomas A Klar; Jaroslaw Jacak
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-05-09

Review 5.  Current trends in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Marco Mravic; Bruno Péault; Aaron W James
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Spatial Control of Cell-Nanosurface Interactions by Tantalum Oxide Nanodots for Improved Implant Geometry.

Authors:  Udesh Dhawan; Hsu An Pan; Chia Hui Lee; Ying Hao Chu; Guewha Steven Huang; Yan Ren Lin; Wen Liang Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  3D-Printed Scaffolds and Biomaterials: Review of Alveolar Bone Augmentation and Periodontal Regeneration Applications.

Authors:  Farah Asa'ad; Giorgio Pagni; Sophia P Pilipchuk; Aldo Bruno Giannì; William V Giannobile; Giulio Rasperini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-06-05

8.  Osteoconductive Microarchitecture of Bone Substitutes for Bone Regeneration Revisited.

Authors:  Chafik Ghayor; Franz E Weber
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  A Standardized Collagen-Based Scaffold Improves Human Hepatocyte Shipment and Allows Metabolic Studies over 10 Days.

Authors:  Marc Ruoß; Victor Häussling; Frank Schügner; Leon H H Olde Damink; Serene M L Lee; Liming Ge; Sabrina Ehnert; Andreas K Nussler
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-16

Review 10.  Biological responses to nanomaterials: understanding nano-bio effects on cell behaviors.

Authors:  Xi-Qiu Liu; Rui-Zhi Tang
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.419

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.