Literature DB >> 23463122

Femoral neck fractures: prognosis based on a new classification after superselective angiography.

Yang Liu1, MingHui Li, Mi Zhang, Kai Sun, HeZhong Wang, Xi Yuan, Lin Cai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vascular injury after femoral neck fracture can determine its prognosis. This study aimed to determine methods of evaluating femoral neck fracture and accurately predicting the prognosis.
METHODS: Forty-five patients with a single femoral neck fracture all underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and were divided into three types by DSA. DSA showing three to six supporting band vascular images crossing the fracture line was classified as type I. DSA showing one to two supporting band vascular images crossing the fracture line was classified as type II. When DSA did not show vascular images crossing the fracture line, it was classified as type III. The 45 patients were divided according to age into elderly, middle-aged and youth groups. All cases were given internal fixation operations by a hollow screw under a C-brachial machine. After a follow-up of 6-60 months, avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH) and fracture healing of different type and different ages of patients were evaluated according to symptoms and imaging examinations.
RESULTS: (1) For DSA types I, II and III, the rates of ANFH were 0, 7.14 and 100 %, respectively, and the rates of fracture disunion were 13.3, 7.15 and 0 %, respectively. Therefore, the rate of ANFH is negatively related to the visible supporting band vascular amount on DSA. (2) In the young group, the proportions of types I, II and III were 6.7, 26.67 and 66.7 %, respectively, 18.18, 36.36 and 45.45 % in the middle-aged group and 63.16, 31.58 and 5.27 % in the elderly group. The rates of necrosis for elderly, middle-aged and youth were 10.53, 45.45 and 66.67 %, respectively, and the rates of fracture disunion were 0, 0 and 6.67 %, respectively. So we can draw the conclusion that the amount of supporting band vascular images is inversely proportional to age and the union is directly related to age, but independent of the supporting band vascular amount of DSA showing.
CONCLUSION: The new classification after superselective angiography is valuable for predicting the prognosis of femoral neck fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23463122     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-013-0367-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  7 in total

1.  Pathophysiology and risk factors for osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Kalpit N Shah; Jennifer Racine; Lynne C Jones; Roy K Aaron
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-09

2.  The Use of Superselective Arteriography in the Evaluation of the Influence of Intracapsular Hip Joint Pressure on the Blood Flow of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Kai Wu; Jianhua Huang; Qiugen Wang
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Comparison of Ordinary Cannulated Compression Screw and Double-Head Cannulated Compression Screw Fixation in Vertical Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Yuelei Zhang; Chao Yan; Lecheng Zhang; Wei Zhang; Gang Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Development and validation of a predictive nomogram for postoperative osteonecrosis of the femoral head with cannulated screws fixation.

Authors:  Wanbo Zhu; Kai Xie; Xianzuo Zhang; Jiazhao Yang; Lei Xu; Junchen Zhu; Shiyuan Fang; Chen Zhu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

5.  The Significance of Evaluating the Femoral Head Blood Supply after Femoral Neck Fracture: A New Classification for Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Dewei Zhao; Zihua Wang; Liangliang Cheng; Simiao Tian; Baoyi Liu; Lei Yang; Zhijie Ma
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 6.  The Risk of Avascular Necrosis Following the Stabilization of Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wojciech Konarski; Tomasz Poboży; Andrzej Kotela; Andrzej Śliwczyński; Ireneusz Kotela; Martyna Hordowicz; Jan Krakowiak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Author's reply.

Authors:  Bhava Rj Satish; Atmakuri V Ranganadham; Karuppasamy Ramalingam; Sujit Kumar Tripathy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.251

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.