Literature DB >> 23462707

Critical structure movement in cervix brachytherapy.

Clare Anderson1, Gerry Lowe, Rachel Wills, David Inchley, Victoria Beenstock, Linda Bryant, Caroline Chapman, Peter J Hoskin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To investigate critical structure movement and subsequent dose received during conformal MR-guided cervix brachytherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 patients (36 HDR fractions) undergoing brachytherapy for cervical cancer underwent a second MR immediately prior to treatment (pre-treatment MR). Bowel (including sigmoid), bladder and rectum were outlined on both planning and pre-treatment MR scans and dosimetry compared.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the volumes of the OAR doses across the two scans but there were large variations between patients with differences of up to 3.3 Gy observed. The percentage of fractions for which D2cc was within 10% of that planned was 61.1%, 41.7% and 47.2% for bladder, rectum and bowel, respectively. The average time between MR scans was found to be 4.75 h (SD±1.2; range 3.2-9.9 h), with no correlation found with critical structure movement within this range.
CONCLUSIONS: OAR movement is difficult to predict though significant changes occur in individual patients. In 61% of cases in our sample the D2cc dose changed by at least 10% for at least one OAR from that planned. Pre-treatment imaging with subsequent adjustment of dosimetry will minimise the impact of organ movement on delivered dose.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23462707     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  9 in total

Review 1.  In vivo dosimetry: trends and prospects for brachytherapy.

Authors:  G Kertzscher; A Rosenfeld; S Beddar; K Tanderup; J E Cygler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparison of predictive performance for toxicity by accumulative dose of DVH parameter addition and DIR addition for cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuya Miyasaka; Noriyuki Kadoya; Rei Umezawa; Yoshiki Takayama; Kengo Ito; Takaya Yamamoto; Shohei Tanaka; Suguru Dobashi; Ken Takeda; Kenji Nemoto; Takeo Iwai; Keiichi Jingu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Excess dose-related parameters (Vex, Rex, and iRex): novel predictors and late toxicity correlations in cervical cancer image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.

Authors:  Tissana Prasartseree; Pittaya Dankulchai; Peter J Hoskin
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-10-30

4.  3D image-based adapted high-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer with and without interstitial needles: measurement of applicator shift between imaging and dose delivery.

Authors:  Leif Karlsson; Per Thunberg; Anders With; Louise Bohr Mordhorst; Jan Persliden
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-02-27

Review 5.  Review on Treatment Planning Systems for Cervix Brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy): Some Desirable and Convenient Practical Aspects to Be Implemented from Radiation Oncologist and Medical Physics Perspectives.

Authors:  Antonio Otal; Francisco Celada; Jose Chimeno; Javier Vijande; Santiago Pellejero; Maria-Jose Perez-Calatayud; Elena Villafranca; Naiara Fuentemilla; Francisco Blazquez; Silvia Rodriguez; Jose Perez-Calatayud
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Brachytherapy dose changes: comparing in-room and out-room image-guided brachytherapy. A randomized study.

Authors:  Pooriwat Muangwong; Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Patumrat Sripan; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Bongkot Jia-Mahasap; Razvan Galalae; Imjai Chitapanarux
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2022-08-19

7.  A multicentre comparison of the dosimetric impact of inter- and intra-fractional anatomical variations in fractionated cervix cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Nicole Nesvacil; Kari Tanderup; Taran P Hellebust; Astrid De Leeuw; Stefan Lang; Sandy Mohamed; Swamidas V Jamema; Clare Anderson; Richard Pötter; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Dosimetric impacts of applicator displacements and applicator reconstruction-uncertainties on 3D image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Joshua Schindel; Winson Zhang; Sudershan K Bhatia; Wenqing Sun; Yusung Kim
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2013-12-18

9.  Intra-fractional dosimetric analysis of image-guided intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Junfang Yan; Jiawei Zhu; Kai Chen; Lang Yu; Fuquan Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.