OBJECTIVES: To (1) assess the effectiveness of home- and community-based rehabilitation (HCBR) in a large cohort of individuals with disabilities secondary to cerebrovascular accident (CVA); and (2) evaluate the responsiveness to treatment of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) to changes resulting from HCBR in this patient group. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of program evaluation data for treatment completers and noncompleters. SETTING: HCBR conducted in 7 geographically distinct U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with CVA (n=738) who completed the prescribed course of rehabilitation (completed course of treatment [CCT]) compared with 150 individuals who were precipitously discharged (PD) before program completion. INTERVENTION: HCBR delivered by certified professional staff on an individualized basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) completed by professional consensus on admission and at discharge. RESULTS: With the use of analysis of covariance, MPAI-4 total scores at discharge for CCT participants were compared with those of PD participants, with admission MPAI-4, age, length of stay, and time since event as covariates. CCT participants showed greater improvement than PD participants (F=99.48, P<.001) with a moderate effect size (partial η(2)=.10). Group differences and effect sizes were similar for the 3 index scores: Ability (F=75.96, P<.001; partial η(2)=.08), Adjustment (F=99.67, P<.001; partial η(2)=.10), and Participation (F=69.15, P<.001; partial η(2)=.07). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals in the CCT group who received the entire planned course of HCBR showed greater improvement on all MPAI-4 indexes than those in the PD group who were discharged before completing the prescribed program. This dose-response relationship provides evidence of a causal relationship between treatment and outcome.
OBJECTIVES: To (1) assess the effectiveness of home- and community-based rehabilitation (HCBR) in a large cohort of individuals with disabilities secondary to cerebrovascular accident (CVA); and (2) evaluate the responsiveness to treatment of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) to changes resulting from HCBR in this patient group. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of program evaluation data for treatment completers and noncompleters. SETTING:HCBR conducted in 7 geographically distinct U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with CVA (n=738) who completed the prescribed course of rehabilitation (completed course of treatment [CCT]) compared with 150 individuals who were precipitously discharged (PD) before program completion. INTERVENTION: HCBR delivered by certified professional staff on an individualized basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) completed by professional consensus on admission and at discharge. RESULTS: With the use of analysis of covariance, MPAI-4 total scores at discharge for CCT participants were compared with those of PDparticipants, with admission MPAI-4, age, length of stay, and time since event as covariates. CCT participants showed greater improvement than PDparticipants (F=99.48, P<.001) with a moderate effect size (partial η(2)=.10). Group differences and effect sizes were similar for the 3 index scores: Ability (F=75.96, P<.001; partial η(2)=.08), Adjustment (F=99.67, P<.001; partial η(2)=.10), and Participation (F=69.15, P<.001; partial η(2)=.07). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals in the CCT group who received the entire planned course of HCBR showed greater improvement on all MPAI-4 indexes than those in the PD group who were discharged before completing the prescribed program. This dose-response relationship provides evidence of a causal relationship between treatment and outcome.
Authors: Dónal G Fortune; R Stephen Walsh; Brian Waldron; Caroline McGrath; Maurice Harte; Sarah Casey; Brian McClean Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2015-09-08
Authors: Richard J Siegert; Diana M Jackson; E Diane Playford; Simon Fleminger; Lynne Turner-Stokes Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 2.692