Literature DB >> 23462460

Current evidence on the relationship between three polymorphisms in the CYP1A2 gene and the risk of cancer.

Li Zhenzhen1, Liu Xianghua, Sun Ning, Guo Zhan, Ren Chuanchuan, Li Jie.   

Abstract

CYP1A2 is an important cytochrome P450 enzyme that is involved in the metabolism of many clinical drugs and activation of some precarcinogens. Functional CYP1A2 polymorphisms are considered to exert significant effects on the risk of cancer, but the conclusions are inconsistent. Three commonly studied CYP1A2 polymorphisms, namely rs762551 (A>C), rs2069514 (G>A), and rs3569413 (T>delT), were selected to explore their association with the risk of development of cancer by meta-analysis of published case-control studies. Two investigators independently searched the PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Chinese Biomedicine Database. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for CYP1A2 polymorphisms and the risk of cancer were calculated in a fixed-effects model (the Mantel-Haenszel method) and a random-effects model (the DerSimonian and Laird method) when appropriate. For rs762551, 37 studies were eligible (16 825 cases and 21 513 controls); for rs2069514, 15 studies were eligible (3677 cases and 5127 controls); and for rs3569413, eight studies were eligible (1607 cases and 2043 controls). The results showed that no significant associations with the risk of cancer were found in any model (allele contrast, codominant, dominant, or recessive model) in terms of rs2069514 and rs3569413 when all studies were pooled into a meta-analysis. However, when stratified by cancer type, a statistically significantly elevated risk of cancer was only found in lung cancer for rs3569413 (delT-allele vs. T-allele: OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.16-1.95). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, a significantly increased risk of cancer was found in the Caucasian population for rs3569413 (delT-allele vs. T-allele: OR=1.63, 95% CI=1.01-2.63). With respect to rs762551, we found that carriers of the C-allele showed an increased overall risk of developing cancer compared with A-allele carriers (C-allele vs. A-allele: OR=1.08, 95% CI=1.01-1.16). Further subgroup analyses showed that the rs762551 polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of cancer in the subgroup of Caucasians (C-allele vs. A-allele: OR=1.14, 95% CI=1.00-1.28; dominant model: OR=1.19, 95% CI=1.02-1.37). These results suggest that the rs3569413 polymorphism of the CYP1A2 gene is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer and the rs762551 polymorphism of the CYP1A2 gene might be a potential biomarker for the risk of cancer among Caucasians. Further large and well-designed studies are required to confirm this conclusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23462460     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32835f3bd2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  3 in total

1.  Association between the CYP1A2 polymorphisms and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Xia Sun; Ying-Hua Chen; Zhi-Zhong Liu; Jian-Jun Xie; Wei Wang; Ya-Ping Du; Yu Chen; Xu-Liang Shen; Xiao-Feng He; Li-Xia Wu; Wu Wei; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Genome-wide association study identified SNP on 15q24 associated with bladder cancer risk in Japanese population.

Authors:  Koichi Matsuda; Atsushi Takahashi; Candace D Middlebrooks; Wataru Obara; Yasutomo Nasu; Keiji Inoue; Kenji Tamura; Ichiro Yamasaki; Yoshio Naya; Chizu Tanikawa; Ri Cui; Jonine D Figueroa; Debra T Silverman; Nathaniel Rothman; Mikio Namiki; Yoshihiko Tomita; Hiroyuki Nishiyama; Kenjiro Kohri; Takashi Deguchi; Masayuki Nakagawa; Masayoshi Yokoyama; Tsuneharu Miki; Hiromi Kumon; Tomoaki Fujioka; Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson; Michiaki Kubo; Yusuke Nakamura; Taro Shuin
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Lack of association between polymorphisms in the CYP1A2 gene and risk of cancer: evidence from meta-analyses.

Authors:  Vladimir Vukovic; Carolina Ianuale; Emanuele Leoncini; Roberta Pastorino; Maria Rosaria Gualano; Rosarita Amore; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.