Literature DB >> 23461869

Biomedical PhD education--an international perspective.

Michael J Mulvany1.   

Abstract

The PhD, otherwise known as the doctor of philosophy or Dr. Phil., is an internationally recognized degree, indicating that the PhD graduate has received training in research under supervision. Traditionally, the PhD was the route to an academic career, with most successful PhD graduates receiving tenured university positions. However, over the past 20-30 years, and particularly the past 10 years, the situation has changed dramatically. Governments in many countries have invested massively in PhD education, believing that trained researchers will contribute to the 'knowledge society', and thus increase the competitiveness of their countries in the future economies of the world. Thus, only a small fraction of PhD graduates now end up in academic research. Yet, the PhD remains a research degree, and indeed, institutions have become heavily dependent on PhD students for their research output. The situation has thus created a paradox. On the one hand, it has become essential for institutions to have many PhD students and for the research performed to be of the highest level. On the other hand, the careers of PhD students are not necessarily going to be directly related to the research performed during their PhD studies. The purpose of this article is to explore how this seeming paradox is being addressed in biomedicine and to show that far from being inconsistent that the two aspects are in fact complementary. The article is based on the author's experience as Head of Aarhus Graduate School of Health Sciences 2002-2011 and his work with graduate schools across Europe and internationally through the organization ORPHEUS.
© 2013 Nordic Pharmacological Society. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23461869     DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.12063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 1742-7835            Impact factor:   4.080


  3 in total

1.  A comparison of best practices for doctoral training in Europe and North America.

Authors:  Joey V Barnett; Robert A Harris; Michael J Mulvany
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.693

2.  A comparison of doctoral training in biomedicine and medicine for some UK and Scandinavian graduate programmes: learning from each other.

Authors:  Anwen Williams; Meriel G Jones; Roland Jonsson; Robert A Harris; Michael J Mulvany
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.693

3.  A cross-institutional analysis of the effects of broadening trainee professional development on research productivity.

Authors:  Patrick D Brandt; Susi Sturzenegger Varvayanis; Tracey Baas; Amanda F Bolgioni; Janet Alder; Kimberly A Petrie; Isabel Dominguez; Abigail M Brown; C Abigail Stayart; Harinder Singh; Audra Van Wart; Christine S Chow; Ambika Mathur; Barbara M Schreiber; David A Fruman; Brent Bowden; Christopher A Wiesen; Yvonne M Golightly; Chris E Holmquist; Daniel Arneman; Joshua D Hall; Linda E Hyman; Kathleen L Gould; Roger Chalkley; Patrick J Brennwald; Rebekah L Layton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 8.029

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.