Literature DB >> 23461787

A cost utilization analysis of intrathecal therapy for refractory cancer pain: identifying factors associated with cost benefit.

Shane E Brogan1, Natalie Best Winter, Annalise Abiodun, Reza Safarpour.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intrathecal therapy (ITT) for cancer pain is characterized by high initial cost followed by low maintenance costs. Non-ITT pain management is associated with steadily increasing cumulative cost that can equal the cost of ITT over time. The intent of this modeling project is to identify factors associated with relatively rapid achievement of cost-benefit with ITT.
DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was performed on 36 patients with cancer pain who underwent ITT and survived beyond 4 weeks.
METHODS: Data on the cost of conventional opioid therapy prior to ITT and at 4-6 weeks were collected and projected over time. ITT costs included all intrathecal pump implantation and maintenance costs. Pre-ITT opioid regimens were stratified into high-cost conventional (HCC-high-dose, nongeneric, or use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, N = 12) and low-cost conventional (low-dose or generic, N = 24) regimens.
RESULTS: The median daily cost of opioid medications pre-ITT was $21.26 (25th-75th percentile $10.31-78.85, range 0-$971.97) vs $0 (25th-75th percentile $0-0.70), P = 0.007, post-ITT. In the HCC group, the median daily cost was $172.47 (25th-75th percentile $67.29-406.20). The median daily cost of ITT medications was $16.01 (25th-75th percentile $9.52-23.23).When these data were used to model costs over the long term, including pump implantation costs, cost-benefit for all patients compared with conventional therapy was predicted at 344 months but at 7.4 months in the HCC group. Seven patients (19%) achieved cost equivalence within 6 months and three of these within the first 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients on high-cost opioid regimens, ITT may become cost-beneficial within 6 months. Factors associated with earlier attainment of ITT cost-benefit include the use of parenteral therapy, high-dose opioids, and the use of nongeneric opioid products. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23461787     DOI: 10.1111/pme.12060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  9 in total

Review 1.  Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain.

Authors:  Fangfang Xing; R Jason Yong; Alan David Kaye; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-02-05

2.  Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Pain: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-01-29

Review 3.  The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Best Practices and Guidelines for the Interventional Management of Cancer-Associated Pain.

Authors:  Mansoor M Aman; Ammar Mahmoud; Timothy Deer; Dawood Sayed; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Shane E Brogan; Vinita Singh; Amitabh Gulati; Natalie Strand; Jacqueline Weisbein; Johnathan H Goree; Fangfang Xing; Ali Valimahomed; Daniel J Pak; Antonios El Helou; Priyanka Ghosh; Krishna Shah; Vishal Patel; Alexander Escobar; Keith Schmidt; Jay Shah; Vishal Varshney; William Rosenberg; Sanjeet Narang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 4.  Practical considerations and patient selection for intrathecal drug delivery in the management of chronic pain.

Authors:  Michael Saulino; Philip S Kim; Erik Shaw
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 5.  Current perspectives on intrathecal drug delivery.

Authors:  Michael M Bottros; Paul J Christo
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Cost analysis of cordotomy and intrathecal pain pump placement for refractory cancer pain.

Authors:  Zaid Aljuboori; William Burke; Kimberly Meyer; Brian Williams
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-04-18

7.  Cost comparison among punctate midline myelotomy, intrathecal pain pump, and spinal cord epidural stimulator.

Authors:  Zaid Aljuboori; Kimberly Meyer; Mayur Sharma; Tyler Ball; Haring Nauta
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-02-18

8.  Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Therapy via a Percutaneous Port for Refractory Cancer Pain in China: An Efficacy, Safety and Cost Utilization Analysis.

Authors:  Wangjun Qin; Yifan Li; Botao Liu; Ying Liu; Yi Zhang; Xianglin Zhang; Pengmei Li; Bifa Fan
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Therapy in Management of Chronic Pain: Present and Future Implementation in Korea.

Authors:  Eun Jung Kim; Jee Youn Moon; Yong Chul Kim; Keun Suk Park; Yong Jae Yoo
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.759

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.