Literature DB >> 23461381

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.

Archie Hughes-Hallett1, Prasad Patki, Nilay Patel, Neil J Barber, Mark Sullivan, Ranjan Thilagarajah.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present the oncologic and functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and analyze retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RAPN was performed on 103 patients; 44 patients underwent a retroperitoneal and 59 a transperitoneal approach. Demographic, operative, and postoperative data was collected and retrospectively analyzed on all patients.
RESULTS: Overall average warm ischemic time was 20.4 (0-48) minutes, total operative time was 175.3 (85-330) minutes, and estimated blood loss was 258.1 (20-3100) mL. When retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches were compared, there was no significant difference in warm ischemic time but a significant reduction in both estimated blood loss and total operative time in the retroperitoneal group.
CONCLUSION: Our series would suggest that if performed by a surgeon familiar with a laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach to renal surgery, retroperitoneal RAPN is at least equivalent to the more common transperitoneal approach in the outcomes assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23461381     DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

Review 1.  Frontiers in robot-assisted retroperitoneal oncological surgery.

Authors:  Wesley W Ludwig; Michael A Gorin; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Simple Enucleation for Renal Tumors: Indications, Techniques, and Results.

Authors:  Adolfo García García; Tania González León
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Trans-peritoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in posterior renal tumours: need for a risk-stratified patient individualised approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew McLean; Ankur Mukherjee; Chandan Phukan; Rajan Veeratterapillay; Naeem Soomro; Bhaskar Somani; Bhavan Prasad Rai
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-05-14

4.  Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores.

Authors:  Seol Ho Choo; Seo Yeon Lee; Hyun Hwan Sung; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi; Seong Il Seo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  [Controversies of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma : survey in the German-speaking countries].

Authors:  S Tietze; M Herms; W Behrendt; J Krause; A Hamza
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Retroperitoneal versus transepritoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for postero-lateral renal masses: an international multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Umberto Carbonara; Daniel Eun; Ithaar Derweesh; Umberto Capitanio; Antonio Celia; Cristian Fiori; Enrico Checcucci; Daniele Amparore; Jennifer Lee; Alessandro Larcher; Devin Patel; Margaret Meagher; Fabio Crocerossa; Alessandro Veccia; Lance J Hampton; Francesco Montorsi; Francesco Porpiglia; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Comparison of Outcomes Between Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Meta-Analysis Based on Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Daqing Zhu; Xue Shao; Gang Guo; Nandong Zhang; Taoping Shi; Yi Wang; Liangyou Gu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  The future of "Retro" robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  David M Strauss; Randall Lee; Fenizia Maffucci; Daniel Abbott; Selma Masic; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

Review 9.  Retroperitoneal Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Comparative Outcomes.

Authors:  Umberto Carbonara; Fabio Crocerossa; Riccardo Campi; Alessandro Veccia; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Daniele Amparore; Enrico Checcucci; Davide Loizzo; Angela Pecoraro; Michele Marchioni; Chiara Lonati; Chandru P Sundaram; Reza Mehrazin; James Porter; Jihad H Kaouk; Francesco Porpiglia; Pasquale Ditonno; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-26

10.  Transperitoneal approach versus retroperitoneal approach: a meta-analysis of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tong Ren; Yan Liu; Xiaowen Zhao; Shaobin Ni; Cheng Zhang; Changgang Guo; Minghua Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.