Literature DB >> 23461335

Degree of sympatry affects reinforcement in Drosophila.

Patrik Nosil1.   

Abstract

In a recent paper, Yukilevich (2012) showed that asymmetries between Drosophila species in the strength of premating isolation tend to match asymmetries in the costs of hybridization (inferred from asymmetries in the strength of postzygotic isolation and range sizes). The results provide novel evidence that the outcome of reinforcement can depend on the strength and frequency of selection against hybridization. Here, I reanalyze the data to demonstrate that another (unconsidered) factor, namely the quantitative degree of sympatry between species, also predictably affects reinforcement. Specifically, premating isolation is strongest at intermediate degrees of sympatry. This result complements, rather than challenges, those of Yukilevich (2012). One possible explanation for this newly discovered pattern is that when the degree of sympatry is small, selection for avoidance of hybridization is rare, but when the degree of sympatry is large, homogenizing gene flow overcomes reinforcing selection. Thus, reinforcement may depend on the balance between selection and gene flow. However, the current work examined degree of sympatry, not gene flow itself. Thus, further data on gene flow levels in Drosophila is required to test this hypothesis, which emerged from the patterns reported here.
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23461335     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01817.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  Wolbachia Acquisition by Drosophila yakuba-Clade Hosts and Transfer of Incompatibility Loci Between Distantly Related Wolbachia.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Dan Vanderpool; William R Conner; Daniel R Matute; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Macroevolutionary speciation rates are decoupled from the evolution of intrinsic reproductive isolation in Drosophila and birds.

Authors:  Daniel L Rabosky; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The evolution of strong reproductive isolation between sympatric intertidal snails.

Authors:  Sean Stankowski; Anja M Westram; Zuzanna B Zagrodzka; Isobel Eyres; Thomas Broquet; Kerstin Johannesson; Roger K Butlin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  On the Coyne and Orr-igin of species: effects of intrinsic postzygotic isolation, ecological differentiation, x chromosome size, and sympatry on Drosophila speciation.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; Jeremy R Lipkowitz; Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Fine-scale geographic patterns of gene flow and reproductive character displacement in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; Emily R Bewick; Brooke E White; Michael J Bray; Devon P Humphreys
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria.

Authors:  Emily R Bewick; Kelly A Dyer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Comparative studies on speciation: 30 years since Coyne and Orr.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Limited genomic divergence between intraspecific forms of Culex pipiens under different ecological pressures.

Authors:  Bruno Gomes; Craig S Wilding; David Weetman; Carla A Sousa; Maria T Novo; Harry M Savage; António P G Almeida; João Pinto; Martin J Donnelly
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Tracing reinforcement through asymmetrical partner preference in the European common vole Microtus arvalis.

Authors:  Mathias Beysard; Rebecca Krebs-Wheaton; Gerald Heckel
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The magnitude of behavioral isolation is affected by characteristics of the mating community.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.