Literature DB >> 23461317

Comparative analyses of sex-ratio variation in dioecious flowering plants.

David L Field1, Melinda Pickup, Spencer C H Barrett.   

Abstract

Dioecious plant species commonly exhibit deviations from the equilibrium expectation of 1:1 sex ratio, but the mechanisms governing this variation are poorly understood. Here, we use comparative analyses of 243 species, representing 123 genera and 61 families to investigate ecological and genetic correlates of variation in the operational (flowering) sex ratio. After controlling for phylogenetic nonindependence, we examined the influence of growth form, clonality, fleshy fruits, pollen and seed dispersal vector, and the possession of sex chromosomes on sex-ratio variation. Male-biased flowering sex ratios were twice as common as female-biased ratios. Male bias was associated with long-lived growth forms (e.g., trees) and biotic seed dispersal and fleshy fruits, whereas female bias was associated with clonality, especially for herbaceous species, and abiotic pollen dispersal. Female bias occurred in species with sex chromosomes and there was some evidence for a greater degree of bias in those with heteromorphic sex chromosomes. Although the role of interactions among these correlates require further study, our results indicate that sex-based differences in costs of reproduction, pollen and seed dispersal mechanisms and sex chromosomes can each play important roles in affecting flowering sex ratios in dioecious plants.
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23461317     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  37 in total

1.  The impact of asexual and sexual reproduction in spatial genetic structure within and between populations of the dioecious plant Marchantia inflexa (Marchantiaceae).

Authors:  Jessica R Brzyski; Christopher R Stieha; D Nicholas McLetchie
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Does sexual dimorphism predispose dioecious riparian trees to sex ratio imbalances under climate change?

Authors:  Kevin R Hultine; Susan E Bush; Joy K Ward; Todd E Dawson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Genetics of dioecy and causal sex chromosomes in plants.

Authors:  Sushil Kumar; Renu Kumari; Vishakha Sharma
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  A test of the size-constraint hypothesis for a limit to sexual dimorphism in plants.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Labouche; John R Pannell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effects of quantitative fecundity in the haploid stage on reproductive success and diploid fitness in the aquatic peat moss Sphagnum macrophyllum.

Authors:  M G Johnson; A J Shaw
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 6.  Living together and living apart: the sexual lives of bryophytes.

Authors:  David Haig
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Haploid Selection Favors Suppressed Recombination Between Sex Chromosomes Despite Causing Biased Sex Ratios.

Authors:  Michael F Scott; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Hill-Robertson Interference Reduces Genetic Diversity on a Young Plant Y-Chromosome.

Authors:  Josh Hough; Wei Wang; Spencer C H Barrett; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Relative strength of fine-scale spatial genetic structure in paternally vs biparentally inherited DNA in a dioecious plant depends on both sex proportions and pollen-to-seed dispersal ratio.

Authors:  I J Chybicki; M Dering; G Iszkuło; K Meyza; J Suszka
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Ecological context and metapopulation dynamics affect sex-ratio variation among dioecious plant populations.

Authors:  David L Field; Melinda Pickup; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.