Literature DB >> 23460037

Diagnostic testing for mild hemophilia a in patients with discrepant one-stage, two-stage, and chromogenic factor VIII:C assays.

Elizabeth M Duncan1, Susan E Rodgers, Simon J McRae.   

Abstract

In recent years, there has been greater awareness among hemostasis scientists and clinicians that factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) measured in certain patients with mild hemophilia A can show different results depending on the assay system. A subgroup of mild hemophilia families have a method-related discrepancy in FVIII:C results, whereby the one-stage clotting assay (FVIII:C-1) is significantly higher than the two-stage clotting assay (FVIII:C-2) or the chromogenic assay (FVIII:C-chr). To identify such patients, the routine laboratory can use automated procedures for the FVIII:C-chr to replace the complex, manual FVIII:C-2 method. Laboratories must employ appropriate quality management to ensure accurate and precise results, especially in the abnormal range. This discrepant phenotype of hemophilia A is seen in up to 40% of mild hemophilia A cases and represents a clinically significant bleeding disorder. A small proportion of these cases have FVIII:C-1 within the normal range and risk a missed diagnosis if the FVIII:C-chr is unavailable. Other patients may be mismanaged if FVIII:C-1 gives an overestimate of FVIII:C and their bleeding risk is consequently underestimated. Affected family members in the discrepant group of patients have a limited range of FVIII (F8) gene missense mutations, causing alterations of the structure of the A1, A2, or A3 domains of FVIII. Therefore, both FVIII:C-chr and F8 gene mutation analysis are recommended to confirm the diagnosis of mild hemophilia A and assist with decisions about the patient's phenotype. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23460037     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1334863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost        ISSN: 0094-6176            Impact factor:   4.180


  6 in total

1.  Life-threatening bleeding in a patient with mild hemophilia A and heterozygosity for von Willebrand disease Type 2N.

Authors:  John N Allan; Kenneth D Friedman; Maria T DeSancho
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Clustered F8 missense mutations cause hemophilia A by combined alteration of splicing and protein biosynthesis and activity.

Authors:  Irving Donadon; John H McVey; Isabella Garagiola; Alessio Branchini; Mimosa Mortarino; Flora Peyvandi; Francesco Bernardi; Mirko Pinotti
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Comparison between coagulation factor VIII quantified with one-stage activity assay and with mass spectrometry in haemophilia A patients: Proof of principle.

Authors:  Anouk A M T Donners; Erik M van Maarseveen; Yrea R J Weetink; Mohsin El Amrani; Kathelijn Fischer; Carin M A Rademaker; Toine C G Egberts; Albert Huisman; Ruben E A Musson
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Evaluation of the Atellica COAG 360 coagulation analyzer in a specialized coagulation laboratory.

Authors:  Karin Strandberg; Cecilia Augustsson
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Hemophilia management: Huge impact of a tiny difference.

Authors:  Fabienne Kloosterman; Anne-Fleur Zwagemaker; Amal Abdi; Samantha Gouw; Giancarlo Castaman; Karin Fijnvandraat
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-02-28

Review 6.  An Update on Laboratory Diagnostics in Haemophilia A and B.

Authors:  Jens Müller; Wolfgang Miesbach; Florian Prüller; Thomas Siegemund; Ute Scholz; Ulrich J Sachs
Journal:  Hamostaseologie       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.145

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.