Literature DB >> 23459992

Failures (with some successes) of assisted reproduction and gamete donation programs.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the possibilities for the treatment of infertility have been improved tremendously, not every couple will be treated successfully.
METHODS: Crude overall pregnancy rates of 50-65% per patient can be achieved nowadays, irrespective of the type of profertility treatment applied first.
RESULTS: IVF only accounts for about 20% of the pregnancies achieved. Dropout is an important reason for not reaching the estimated pregnancy rate. Even after failed IVF, spontaneous pregnancies do occur. Sperm and oocyte donation (OD) offer additional chances to subfertile couples. Severity of the male factor (in sperm donation) and young donor age (in OD) are important determinants of success.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of assisted reproduction technology outcomes would benefit from more universally accepted definitions and deserves better statistical analysis. Long-term cumulative live birth rates of 80% may be expected if dropout can be limited. Milder stimulation, a patient-friendlier approach and better counseling may help to keep more patients in the program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICSI; IVF; assisted reproduction technology; intrauterine insemination; oocyte donation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23459992     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmt007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  8 in total

1.  Less is more: improving outcomes and cutting costs to Quebec's assisted reproduction program.

Authors:  Carmen Messerlian; Jennifer R Fishman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Epidemiologic Approaches for Studying Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Design, Methods, Analysis and Interpretation.

Authors:  Carmen Messerlian; Audrey J Gaskins
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2017-04-17

3.  Risk of breast cancer following fertility treatment--a registry based cohort study of parous women in Norway.

Authors:  Marte Myhre Reigstad; Inger Kristin Larsen; Tor Åge Myklebust; Trude Eid Robsahm; Nan Birgitte Oldereid; Anne Katerine Omland; Siri Vangen; Louise Annette Brinton; Ritsa Storeng
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Micro-RNAs in IVF outcome.

Authors:  Saeid Ghorbian; Ahmad Poursadegh Zonouzi
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04

5.  The ReceptIVFity cohort study protocol to validate the urogenital microbiome as predictor for IVF or IVF/ICSI outcome.

Authors:  Rivka Koedooder; Martin Singer; Sam Schoenmakers; Paul Hendrik Maria Savelkoul; Servaas Antonie Morré; Jonathan Dennis de Jonge; Linda Poort; Willem-Jan Simon Stephanus Cuypers; Andries Edward Budding; Joop Stephanus Elisabeth Laven
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  When ART fails: figures, experiences, interventions and a plea for the 'plan B'.

Authors:  Tewes Wischmann; Petra Thorn
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Is oocyte donation a risk factor for preeclampsia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Blázquez; Désirée García; Amelia Rodríguez; Rita Vassena; Francesc Figueras; Valérie Vernaeve
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  Factors associated with failed treatment: an analysis of 121,744 women embarking on their first IVF cycles.

Authors:  Siladitya Bhattacharya; Abha Maheshwari; Jill Mollison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.