| Literature DB >> 23459786 |
Abstract
This study investigated the changes in intracellular [Ca(2+)](i) (intracellular calcium ion concentration) and TRPC6 (transient receptor potential channel 6) expression during angiotensin II (AngII)-induced glomerular mesangial cell (GMC) proliferation, as well as the inhibitory effect of losartan. GMC cultures were split into four groups treated for 24 h: Group N (blank control group), Group A (10(-7 )mol/L AngII), Group LT (10(-7 )mol/L AngII and 10(-5 )mol/L losartan), and Group Pred (10(-7 )mol/L AngII and 10(-5 )mol/L prednisone). GMCs proliferation was measured by the MTT and trypan blue assays. The distribution of TRPC6 was monitored by immunofluorescence, the expression of TRPC6 was detected by RT-PCR and Western blotting, and [Ca(2+)](i) was measured by laser scanning confocal microscopy. The results showed that the maximal proliferation of GMCs was induced by treatment with 10(-7 )mol/L AngII for 24 h. In Group A, the distribution of TRPC6 was not uniform in the cell membrane, there was increased accumulation of this protein within the cytoplasm, and the increased expression of TRPC6 and [Ca(2+)](i) was consistent with the proliferation of cells. In Group LT, losartan inhibited the proliferation of GMCs significantly, the levels of TRPC6 and [Ca(2+)](i) were diminished, and the distribution of TRPC6 was improved. Prednisone also significantly inhibited the proliferation of GMCs and had no effects on the expression of TRPC6 and [Ca(2+)](i) in Group Pred. These findings suggested that AngII could enhance the expression of TRPC6, increase [Ca(2+)](i,) and demonstrate a time-dose-response relationship with the proliferation of GMCs, while losartan reversed the effect of AngII on GMC proliferation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23459786 PMCID: PMC4000622 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-013-0232-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Med ISSN: 1591-8890 Impact factor: 3.984
Real-time PCR primer sequences and amplicon sizes
| Gene | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Size (bp) | Accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRPC6 | F: TGG CAA GTC CAG CAT ACC TGT C | 178 | NM 053559 |
| (Rattus) | R: GTG TTT CTG CAG AGG TCC AGG AG | ||
| GAPDH | F: GGC ACA GTC AAG GCT GAG AAT G | 143 | NM 017008 |
| (Rattus) | R: ATG GTG GTG AAG ACG CCA GTA |
Fig. 1Images of immunofluorescence staining for GMC (×400). a Desmin(+); b a-Actin(+); c Myosin(+); d Vimentin(+); e Keratin(−); f Factor VIII (−) (Blue color was DAPI nuclei staining, the target protein(−)) (color figure online)
Changes in GMC proliferation induced by AngII (mean ± SD)
| Groups (mol/L) | 0 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.147 ± 0.016 | 0.230 ± 0.021 | 0.161 ± 0.020 | 0.162 ± 0.017 |
| 10−8 | 0.149 ± 0.013 | 0.298 ± 0.014 (29.6 %) | 0.217 ± 0.018 (34.4 %) | 0.202 ± 0.015 (92.3 %) |
| 10−7 | 0.152 ± 0.027 | 0.699 ± 0.012 (203.6 %)**##△△abc | 0.349 ± 0.025 (116.1 %)** | 0.470 ± 0.016 (189.8 %)** |
| 10−6 | 0.152 ± 0.018 | 0.411 ± 0.021 (78.6 %)*#△ | 0.330 ± 0.022 (104.4 %)* | 0.291 ± 0.019 (79.6 %)* |
| 10−5 | 0.151 ± 0.022 | 0.421 ± 0.019 (83.1 %)*#△ | 0.338 ± 0.019 (109.7 %)* | 0.281 ± 0.018 (73.5 %)* |
(%) Proliferation rate; versus Group 0 mol/L, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01; Group 24 h versus 48 h, # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01; Group 24 h versus 72 h, △ P < 0.05, △△ P < 0.01; Group 24 h 10−7 versus 24 h 10−8
a P < 0.01; Group 24 h 10−7 versus 24 h 10−6, b P < 0.01; Group 24 h 10−7 versus 24 h 10−5, c P < 0.01
Inhibitory effects of losartan and prednisone on GMC proliferation (mean ± SD)
| Groups | 24 h | Inhibition rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| N | 0.224 ± 0.020 | |
| A (AngII 10−7 mol/L) | 0.691 ± 0.019** | |
| LT (AngII 10−7 mol/L + LT 10−5 mol/L) | 0.418 ± 0.021*# | 39.5 % |
| Pred (AngII 10−7 mol/L + Pred−5 mol/L) | 0.348 ± 0.018*# | 49.6 % |
Versus Group N, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01; versus Group A, # P < 0.05
Fig. 2Distribution images of TRPC6 in GMC (×600). a Group N: TRPC6 was uniformly distributed in cell membrane and cytoplasm, most in cell membrane and few in cytoplasm; b Group A: TRPC6 distribution was not continuous along membrane, with some membrane region missing of TPRC6; more TRPC6 appeared in cytoplasm, even particles can be observed; c Group LT: TRPC6 distribution was more uniform and improved than that in group A; d Group Pred: TRPC6 distribution was similar as in group A, with some regions along cell membrane missing and more in cytoplasm
Fig. 3Expression of GMC TRPC6 mRNA in different groups. 1 Group N; 2 Group A; 3 Group LT; 4 Group Pred
Fig. 5The analysis of TRPC6 mRNA and protein of GMC in different groups. Versus Group N, *P < 0.01; versus Group A, # P < 0.01
Fig. 4Electrophoresis for TRPC6 protein of GMC in different groups. 1 Group N; 2 Group A; 3 Group LT; 4 Group Pred
Fig. 6Distribution of [Ca2+]i for GMC at 4 min and 8 min (×400). a Group N at 4 min; b Group A at 4 min; c Group LT at 4 min; d Group Pred at 4 min; e Group N at 8 min; f Group A at 8 min; g Group LT at 8 min; h Group Pred at 8 min
Fig. 7Changes of [Ca2+]i in GMC in different groups