Literature DB >> 23459703

Vertical dome division: a quality-of-life outcome study.

Michelle Lavinsky-Wolff1, José Eduardo Lutaif Dolci, Humberto Lopes Camargo, Michelle Manzini, Sara Petersen, Sabrina Romanczuk, Rodrigo Pizzoni, Carisi Anne Polanczyk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing nasal tip surgery with the vertical dome division technique using validated instruments (Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation [ROE] and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation [NOSE]). STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with planned data collection.
SETTING: Tertiary university center. SUBJECT AND METHODS: Patients undergoing primary cosmetic and functional rhinoseptoplasty using vertical dome division were consecutively evaluated. The ROE, NOSE, and 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) were administered pre- and postoperatively.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included and completed pre- and postoperative questionnaires. Their median age was 28 years, 27 (61%) were female, and the median duration of follow-up was 5 months (range, 3-9 months). Median postoperative ROE, NOSE, and VAS scores (79 [66; 87], 20 [15; 23], and 88 [61; 97], respectively) showed significant improvement compared with preoperative scores (29 [16; 41], 75 [60; 95], and 65 [46; 82], respectively; P < .001). The change in median ROE score was significantly greater in normal- and thin-skinned patients than in thick-skinned patients (54 vs 33; P = .033). Median changes in NOSE-p (-48.5 vs -68.0; P = .10) and VAS (69.0 vs 48.0; P =.083) scores did not differ between normal-/thin- and thick-skinned patients.
CONCLUSION: Vertical dome division is a versatile technique for nasal tip refinement that resulted in significant improvement in quality-of-life outcomes related to rhinoplasty and nasal obstruction, as well as satisfaction with nasal appearance in a short-term follow-up period. The vertical dome division technique does not seem to be indicated only in patients with thick skin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23459703     DOI: 10.1177/0194599813480629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  4 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of the German version of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty (D-OAR).

Authors:  Christoph Spiekermann; Claudia Rudack; Markus Stenner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Charles A East; Stephen B Baker; Lydia Badia; Jonathan A Schwitzer; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.611

3.  Association of Skin Thickness With Alar Base Reduction in Patients Undergoing Lateral Crural Repositioning and Strut Grafting.

Authors:  A Emre Ilhan; Tevfik Sozen; Basak Caypinar Eser; Betul Cengiz
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

4.  Adaption and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale in German language (D-NOSE).

Authors:  Christoph Spiekermann; Eleftherios Savvas; Claudia Rudack; Markus Stenner
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.186

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.