| Literature DB >> 23458943 |
Ahmed A Elberry1, Shereen M Refaie, Mohamed Kamel, Tarek Ali, Hatem Darwish, Osama Ashour.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical use of cisplatin (CP) is highly limited because of its renal toxicity and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that intensify the cytotoxic effects. Oxytocin (OT) was previously shown to have antioxidant activity. DESIGN ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23458943 PMCID: PMC6078576 DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.57
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Saudi Med ISSN: 0256-4947 Impact factor: 1.526
Figure 1Effect of oxytocin (OT) treatment on serum creatinine in cisplatin (CP)-induced nephrotoxicity.
Figure 2Effect of oxytocin (OT) on serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level in cispaltin (CP)- induced nephrotoxicity (n=12 each group). aP<.05 vs. control group; bP<.05 vs. CP group.
Effect of oxytocin treatment on blood urea and serum albumin in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.
| Urea (mg/dL) | Albumin (g/dL) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Control | 24.3 (3.5) | 5.3 (0.10) |
| OT | 29.6 (4.2) | 5.1 (0.24) |
| CP | 130 (9.7) | 3.8 (0.5) |
| OT+CP | 62.0 (5.7) | 4.1 (0.13) |
Data are the mean (SD) of 12 rats in each group. OT: oxytocin; CP: cisplatin.
P<.05 vs. control group
P<.05 vs. CP group.
Effect of oxytocin (OT) treatment on the levels of reduced glutathione (GSH), thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and nitrite (NO2) in cisplatin (CP)- induced nephrotoxicity.
| GSH (μmol/g protein) | TBARS (n mol/g protein) | NO2 (μmol/mg protein) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Control | 1.80 (0.53) | 20.6 (3.30) | 0.10 (0.14) |
| OT | 1.43 (0.29) | 23.2 (5.70) | 0.11 (0.17) |
| CP | 0.20 (0.10) | 51.3 (5.11) | 0.38 (2.20) |
| OT+CP | 1.20 (0.41) | 25.8 (4.93) | 0.18 (0.20) |
Data are the mean (SD) of 12 rats in each group. OT: oxytocin; CP: cisplatin.
P<.05 vs. control group
P<.05 vs. CP group.
Effect of oxytocin (OT) treatment on the activities of glutathione S-transferase (GST), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) in cisplatin (CP)-induced nephrotoxicity.
| GST (U/mg protein) | CAT (U/mg protein) | SOD (U/mg protein) | GPx (U/mg protein) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Control | 0.82 (0.19) | 5.13 (0.57) | 53.1 (4.10) | 29.12 (2.82) |
| OT | 0.88 (0.08) | 5.05 (0.53) | 58.6 (4.51) | 30.03 (3.07) |
| CP | 0.36 (0.08) | 2.46 (0.37) | 30.6 (3.41) | 19.82 (2.01) |
| OT+CP | 0.58 (0.1) | 3.72 (0.26) | 39.1 (3.14) | 23.26 (2.07) |
Data are the mean (SD) of 12 rats in each group.
P<.05 vs. control group
P<.05 vs. CP group.
Figure 3Effect of oxytocin (OT) treatment on Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in in cisplatin (CP)-induced nephrotoxicity (n=12 each group). aP<.05 vs. control group; bP<.05 vs. CP group.
Figure 4Histopathological finding (Hematoxylin and eosin, ×200) from (A) control group and (B) oxytocin (OT) only treated group showing normal histopathological distribution; (C) cisplatin-treated (CP) group showing prominent tubular dilatation with flat epithelial lining, cast formation and interstitial inflammation (D) OT plus CP group displaying remarkable improvement in the histological appearance with marked reduction in CP-induced tubular damage, compared to samples treated with CP alone.