Literature DB >> 23458801

Generating random rough edges, surfaces, and volumes.

Chris A Mack1.   

Abstract

Numerical methods of generating rough edges, surfaces, and volumes for subsequent simulations are commonly employed, but result in data with a variance that is downward biased from the desired value. Thus, it is highly desirable to quantify and to minimize this bias. Here, the degree of bias is determined through analytical derivations and numerical simulations as a function of the correlation length and the roughness exponent of several model power spectral density functions. The bias can be minimized by proper choice of grid size for a fixed number of data points, and this optimum grid size scales as the correlation length. The common approach of using a fixed grid size for such simulations leads to varying amounts of bias, which can easily be confounded with the physical effects being investigated.

Year:  2013        PMID: 23458801     DOI: 10.1364/AO.52.001472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Opt        ISSN: 1559-128X            Impact factor:   1.980


  3 in total

1.  Virtual rough samples to test 3D nanometer-scale scanning electron microscopy stereo photogrammetry.

Authors:  J S Villarrubia; V N Tondare; A E Vladár
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-08

2.  Impact of Line Edge Roughness on ReRAM Uniformity and Scaling.

Authors:  Vassilios Constantoudis; George Papavieros; Panagiotis Karakolis; Ali Khiat; Themistoklis Prodromakis; Panagiotis Dimitrakis
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Data-driven approaches to optical patterned defect detection.

Authors:  Mark-Alexander Henn; Hui Zhou; Bryan M Barnes
Journal:  OSA Contin       Date:  2019-09-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.