Literature DB >> 23458579

Are two-stage hepatectomies associated with more complications than one-stage procedures?

Erik Schadde1, Ksenija Slankamenac, Stefan Breitenstein, Mickael Lesurtel, Michelle De Oliveira, Beatrice Beck-Schimmer, Philipp Dutkowski, Pierre-Alain Clavien.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two-stage liver resections with portal vein occlusion have become standard in patients with low volume future liver remnants. Whether they are associated with more complications is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare complications of one- and two-stage resections in a retrospective study.
METHODS: Patients with two-stage right liver resections with a previous portal vein occlusion were compared with patients with one-stage right liver resections between 2002 and 2010. Primary endpoints were the incidence of complications by severity. Secondary endpoints were mortality, post-operative liver- and kidney function tests, length of hospitalization and transfusion events. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to adjust for confounders.
RESULTS: The groups were comparable except for right trisectionectomies, pre-operative chemotherapy and underlying liver disease. Overall complications occurred in 25 out of 35 patients with two-stage and 106 out of 163 in one-stage procedures. Severe complications were observed in 47 out of 163 patients versus 9 out of 35 patients, respectively. Two-stage procedures had no increased adjusted risk for complications [relative risk (RR) 0.9, P = 0.79]. Mortality (5.7% versus 3.7%) and post-operative liver failure rates (2.9% versus 3.1%) were low. Secondary endpoints showed no adjusted differences in risk.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that liver resections in two stages are not associated with more post-operative complications than one-stage resections. These results should support the adoption of two-stage liver resections in selected patients.
© 2012 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23458579      PMCID: PMC3664044          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  25 in total

1.  Right portal vein ligation: a new planned two-step all-surgical approach for complete resection of primary gastrointestinal tumors with multiple bilateral liver metastases.

Authors:  Reza Kianmanesh; Olivier Farges; Eddie K Abdalla; Alain Sauvanet; Philippe Ruszniewski; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Playing Play-Doh to prevent postoperative liver failure: the "ALPPS" approach.

Authors:  Eduardo de Santibañes; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The "50-50 criteria" on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Silvio Balzan; Jacques Belghiti; Olivier Farges; Satoshi Ogata; Alain Sauvanet; Didier Delefosse; François Durand
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatobiliary malignancies.

Authors:  Hauke Lang; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Eirini I Brokalaki; Arnold Radtke; Andrea Frilling; Ernesto P Molmenti; Massimo Malagó; Christoph E Broelsch
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Two-stage hepatectomy: A planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors.

Authors:  R Adam; A Laurent; D Azoulay; D Castaing; H Bismuth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection.

Authors:  M J Schindl; D N Redhead; K C H Fearon; O J Garden; S J Wigmore
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  A two-stage hepatectomy procedure combined with portal vein embolization to achieve curative resection for initially unresectable multiple and bilobar colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Daniel Jaeck; Elie Oussoultzoglou; Edoardo Rosso; Michel Greget; Jean-Christophe Weber; Philippe Bachellier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report.

Authors:  M Makuuchi; B L Thai; K Takayasu; T Takayama; T Kosuge; P Gunvén; S Yamazaki; H Hasegawa; H Ozaki
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade.

Authors:  William R Jarnagin; Mithat Gonen; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Leah Ben-Porat; Sarah Little; Carlos Corvera; Sharon Weber; Leslie H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Volumetric analysis predicts hepatic dysfunction in patients undergoing major liver resection.

Authors:  Margo Shoup; Mithat Gonen; Michael D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; Ronald P DeMatteo; Lawrence H Schwartz; Scott Tuorto; Leslie H Blumgart; Yuman Fong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Current position of ALPPS in the surgical landscape of CRLM treatment proposals.

Authors:  Marcello Donati; Gregor A Stavrou; Karl J Oldhafer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: Advances in diagnosis, management, and long term outcome.

Authors:  Adam S Bodzin; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-28

3.  Concomitant Hepatectomy and Atrial Thrombectomy under Cardiopulmonary Bypass versus Staged Hepatectomy in the Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Large Right Atrial Tumor Thrombi.

Authors:  Wen-Shan Chao; Ching-Hui Shen; Shao-Ciao Luo; Feng-Hsu Wu; Hao-Ji Wei; Chu-Leng Yu; Cheng-Chung Wu; Yun Yen; Fang-Ku P'eng
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Saving lives, limbs and livelihoods: considerations in restructuring a national trauma service.

Authors:  H M Mohan; D Mullan; F McDermott; R J Whelan; C O'Donnell; D C Winter
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Volume regeneration of segments 2 and 3 after right portal vein embolization in patients undergoing two-stage hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Mise; Thomas A Aloia; Claudius Conrad; Steven Y Huang; Michael J Wallace; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Surgical outcomes of two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: comparison to a benchmark procedure.

Authors:  Eyal Mor; Abbas Al-Kurd; Almog Ben Yaacov; Dan Aderka; Aviram Nissan; Arie Ariche
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 7.  A Comparison of Pitfalls after ALPPS Stage 1 or Portal Vein Embolization in Small-for-Size Setting Hepatectomies.

Authors:  Andreas A Schnitzbauer
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-12-04

8.  Synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a national survey of surgeon opinions on simultaneous resection and multidisciplinary cooperation.

Authors:  Carrie Howard; Thomas W Clements; Janet P Edwards; Anthony R MacLean; W Donald Buie; Elijah Dixon; Sean C Grondin; Anthony Gomes; Michael McColl; Sean P Cleary; Shiva Jayaraman; Renelle Daigle; Chad G Ball
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.293

9.  Two-stage hepatectomy aiming for the development of intrahepatic venous collaterals for multiple colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Harufumi Maki; Shouichi Satou; Kentaro Nakajima; Atsuki Nagao; Kazuteru Watanabe; Hitoshi Satodate; Satoshi Nara; Kaoru Furushima; Yasushi Harihara
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-02-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.