Literature DB >> 23458547

The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: a review.

Benjamin W Mooneyham1, Jonathan W Schooler1.   

Abstract

Substantial evidence suggests that mind-wandering typically occurs at a significant cost to performance. Mind-wandering-related deficits in performance have been observed in many contexts, most notably reading, tests of sustained attention, and tests of aptitude. Mind-wandering has been shown to negatively impact reading comprehension and model building, impair the ability to withhold automatized responses, and disrupt performance on tests of working memory and intelligence. These empirically identified costs of mind-wandering have led to the suggestion that mind-wandering may represent a pure failure of cognitive control and thus pose little benefit. However, emerging evidence suggests that the role of mind-wandering is not entirely pernicious. Recent studies have shown that mind-wandering may play a crucial role in both autobiographical planning and creative problem solving, thus providing at least two possible adaptive functions of the phenomenon. This article reviews these observed costs and possible functions of mind-wandering and identifies important avenues of future inquiry.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23458547     DOI: 10.1037/a0031569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  94 in total

1.  Meditation and the Wandering Mind: A Theoretical Framework of Underlying Neurocognitive Mechanisms.

Authors:  Tracy Brandmeyer; Arnaud Delorme
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-06-29

2.  Lesion network mapping demonstrates that mind-wandering is associated with the default mode network.

Authors:  Carissa L Philippi; Joel Bruss; Aaron D Boes; Fatimah M Albazron; Carolina Deifelt Streese; Elisa Ciaramelli; David Rudrauf; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Mind wandering minimizes mind numbing: Reducing semantic-satiation effects through absorptive lapses of attention.

Authors:  Benjamin W Mooneyham; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

4.  Neural mechanisms of internal distraction suppression in visual attention.

Authors:  Abhijit Rajan; Sreenivasan Meyyappan; Harrison Walker; Immanuel Babu Henry Samuel; Zhenhong Hu; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When, Varies Across Laboratory and Daily-Life Settings.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Georgina M Gross; Charlotte A Chun; Bridget A Smeekens; Matt E Meier; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-07-18

6.  Unaware yet reliant on attention: Experience sampling reveals that mind-wandering impedes implicit learning.

Authors:  Michael S Franklin; Jonathan Smallwood; Claire M Zedelius; James M Broadway; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

7.  Stimulating minds to wander.

Authors:  James M Broadway; Claire M Zedelius; Benjamin W Mooneyham; Michael D Mrazek; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  From Inner Speech to Mind-Wandering: Developing a Comprehensive Model of Inner Mental Activity Trajectories.

Authors:  Pablo Fossa; Nicolás Gonzalez; Francesca Cordero Di Montezemolo
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2019-06

Review 9.  The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Jessica R Andrews-Hanna; Jonathan Smallwood; R Nathan Spreng
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  What, Me Worry and Ruminate About DSM-5 and RDoC? The Importance of Targeting Negative Self-Referential Processing.

Authors:  Douglas S Mennin; David M Fresco
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2013-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.