Literature DB >> 23458044

Outcome of intramedullary interlocking SIGN nail in tibial diaphyseal fracture.

Irfanullah Khan1, Shahzad Javed, Gauhar Nawaz Khan, Amer Aziz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of intramedullary interlocking surgical implant generation network (SIGN) nail in diaphyseal tibial fractures in terms of union and failure of implant (breakage of nail or interlocking screws). STUDY
DESIGN: Case series. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Orthopaedics and Spinal Surgery, Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital, Lahore Medical and Dental College, Lahore, from September 2008 to August 2009.
METHODOLOGY: Fifty patients aged 14 - 60 years, of either gender were included, who had closed and Gustilo type I and II open fractures reported in 2 weeks, whose closed reduction was not possible or was unsatisfactory and fracture was located 7 cm below knee joint to 7 cm above ankle joint. Fractures previously treated with external fixator, infected fractures and unfit patients were excluded. All fractures were fixed with intramedullary interlocking SIGN nail and were followed clinically and radiographically for union and for any implant failure.
RESULTS: Forty one (88%) patients had united fracture within 6 months, 5 (10%) patients had delayed union while 4 (8%) patients had non-union. Mean duration for achieving union was 163 + 30.6 days. Interlocking screws were broken in 2 patients while no nail was broken in any patient.
CONCLUSION: Intramedullary interlocking nailing is an effective measure in treating closed and grade I and II open tibial fractures. It provides a high rate of union less complications and early return to function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23458044     DOI: 03.2013/JCPSP.203207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak        ISSN: 1022-386X            Impact factor:   0.711


  7 in total

1.  Complications in patients with intramedullary nails: a case series from a single Cambodian surgical clinic.

Authors:  Erik Woelber; Audrey Martin; Douglas Van Citters; Craig Luplow; Michael Githens; Charlotte Kohn; Yong Jun Kim; Heang Oy; Jim Gollogly
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Focus on interlocking intramedullary nailing without fluoroscopy in resource-limited settings: strategies, outcomes, and outlook.

Authors:  Freddy Mertens Bombah; Florent Anicet Lékina; Daniel Handy Eone; Patrick Wendpouiré Hamed Dakouré; An Sermon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Satisfactory postoperative alignment following retrograde SIGN Fin nailing for femoral shaft fractures: A case-control study.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Wilson; Jordan T Shaw; Mbonisi Malaba; Fasto L T Yugusuk; Philemon Nyambati; Alexander B Siy; Daniel D Galat; Kiprono Koech; Dylan Nugent; Paul S Whiting
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2019-04-01

4.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes following retrograde SIGN fin nailing for femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Wilson; Matthew T Moen; Jordan T Shaw; Ryan M Graf; Richard J Behlmer; Natasha M Simske; Lewis G Zirkle; Paul S Whiting
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2020-08-05

5.  Effect of Different Reduction Intramedullary Nails on Spiral Fracture of Middle and Lower Tibia.

Authors:  Yongxin Shi; Fuqin Li; Weiguo Liang; Jinshi Liu
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Evaluation of the Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Antibiotic-Coated Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Gustilo and Anderson Grades 2 and 3 Open Tibial Shaft Fractures.

Authors:  Darshan Patel; Nagakumar J S; Sandesh Agarawal; Amith Kamath
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-18

7.  Surgical Implant Generation Network Implant Follow-up: Assessment of Squat and Smile and Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Kristin M Alves; Ariel Lerner; Genevieve S Silva; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.884

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.