Literature DB >> 23457385

Recommendations for frequency of visits to monitor systemic lupus erythematosus in asymptomatic patients: data from an observational cohort study.

Dafna D Gladman1, Dominique Ibañez, Ioana Ruiz, Murray B Urowitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to determine the optimal frequency of followup visits in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
METHODS: Patients followed in the lupus clinic over a 2-year period who had at least 3 visits and at least 18 months of followup were included. At each visit patients undergo a complete history, physical examination, and laboratory evaluation. The following variables that would not have been recognized by the patient were identified: proteinuria, hematuria, pyuria, casts, low hemoglobin, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum creatinine, positive anti-DNA antibodies, and low complement. When one of these variables was detected, it was determined whether it was new, and whether other features of activity were present. Thus isolated new variables of interest were identified. Descriptive statistics were used.
RESULTS: A total of 515 patients (89% female, 61% white) met the inclusion criteria, with an average of 6.1 ± 1.5 for a total of 3126 visits. The average length of time between visits was 3.8 ± 1.0 months. In the 515 patients, the variables of interest were the sole manifestation of SLE in 126 (24.5%) patients (in a total of 175 visits). The commonest manifestations were renal, low complement, and DNA antibodies followed by thrombocytopenia, low hemoglobin, and elevated creatinine.
CONCLUSION: One in 4 patients with SLE seen over a 2-year period will have a solitary silent variable of interest that could be detected only by routine laboratory followup. Patients with mild or inactive disease should be followed with clinical and laboratory measures at 3-4 month intervals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DISEASE ACTIVITY; LUPUS; MONITORING; OBSERVATIONAL COHORT; SILENT MANIFESTATIONS

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23457385     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.121094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  7 in total

1.  Impact of follow-up visits on disease outcome in Chinese systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Huanhuan Ma; Jing Dong; Liqin Wang; Lei Zhao; Lin Pan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Risk factors for cataracts in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Authors:  Khaled Alderaan; Vuk Sekicki; Laurence S Magder; Michelle Petri
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Association of clinic setting with quality indicator performance in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sidha Sreedharan; Ning Li; Geoff Littlejohn; Russell Buchanan; Mandana Nikpour; Eric Morand; Alberta Hoi; Vera Golder
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  High Health Care Utilization Preceding Diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Youth.

Authors:  Joyce C Chang; David S Mandell; Andrea M Knight
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 5.  New therapeutic strategies in systemic lupus erythematosus management.

Authors:  Mariele Gatto; Margherita Zen; Luca Iaccarino; Andrea Doria
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 6.  2013 update: Hopkins lupus cohort.

Authors:  Monthida Fangtham; Michelle Petri
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Quality of care predicts outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional analysis of a German long-term study (LuLa cohort).

Authors:  A Kernder; J G Richter; R Fischer-Betz; B Winkler-Rohlfing; R Brinks; M Schneider; G Chehab
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.911

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.