Literature DB >> 2345685

Auditory backward recognition masking: effect of interaural phase on masker efficacy.

R D Shilling1, D R Soderquist.   

Abstract

The effect of interaural phase on pitch and lateralization recognition was examined. Tonal signals were followed by a variable interstimulus interval and an interference tone. Stimuli were presented in a binaural masking-level difference paradigm as a means of manipulating the perceptual location of the signal within the head. In separate tasks, subjects were required to recognize the pitch or location of the signal. The pitch-recognition task resulted in the expected increase in performance as the interstimulus interval increased. There was no effect of interaural phase on pitch-recognition performance. There was no significant effect of interstimulus interval on performance in location recognition. Subjects were proficient at recognizing location of the signal regardless of the interstimulus interval. The data suggest that a strict single-channel interpretation of the preperceptual storage model of backward auditory recognition is inadequate.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2345685     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  12 in total

1.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. I. Component frequency, temporal position, and silent intervals.

Authors:  C S Watson; H W Wroton; W J Kelly; C A Benbassat
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recognition masking of auditory lateralization and pitch judgments.

Authors:  D W Massaro; M M Cohen; W L Idson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Backward recognition masking.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of click rate and delay on breakdown of the precedence effect.

Authors:  R K Clifton; R L Freyman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-08

5.  Auditory backward recognition masking with well-practiced listeners.

Authors:  H J Kallman; S C Brown
Journal:  J Aud Res       Date:  1986-10

6.  A comparison of forward versus backward recognition masking.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-10

7.  Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Preperceptual auditory images.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-09

9.  Similarity effects in backward recognition masking.

Authors:  H J Kallman; D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Backward masking, the suffix effect, and preperceptual storage.

Authors:  H J Kallman; D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perceptual order and the effect of vocalic context of fricative perception.

Authors:  V Mann; S D Soli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.