Literature DB >> 23456393

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous conivaptan in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment.

Michael J Roy1, Keith A Erdman, Anura T Abeyratne, Lisa C Plumb, Kenneth Lasseter, Dennis S Riff, James J Keirns.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conivaptan is a non-peptide dual antagonist of vasopressin V1A and V2 receptors that is approved in the United States as an intravenous formulation for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia in hospitalized patients. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous conivaptan had not been studied in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of intravenous conivaptan in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment compared with subjects with normal function. STUDY
DESIGN: These studies were phase I, open-label pharmacokinetic studies conducted at two sites in the US. PATIENTS: Men and non-pregnant women 30-70 years of age were allocated to the mild (Child-Pugh classification score of 5-6) or moderate (Child-Pugh classification score of 7-9) hepatically impaired groups (n = 8-9 per group) based on their liver function assessed at screening. For the renal study, men and non-pregnant women between 18 and 70 years of age were assigned to renal function groups (n = 8-9 per group) based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) assessed at screening. Normal renal function was defined as an eGFR >80 ml/min, mild renal impairment as 50-80 ml/min, and moderate renal impairment as 30-49 ml/min. Subjects with normal hepatic or renal function were selected to match the race, sex, age, and body mass index of subjects enrolled in the impaired groups. INTERVENTION: Subjects were administered a 20-mg/30-min intravenous loading dose of conivaptan on day 1, followed by a 20-mg/23.5-h continuous conivaptan infusion. On day 2, immediately following the end of the day 1 infusion, a 20-mg/24-h continuous conivaptan infusion was administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary pharmacokinetic parameters estimated were the area under the plasma conivaptan concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC∞), plasma conivaptan concentrations at the end of the 20-mg loading dose (C LD), and plasma conivaptan concentrations at the end of the second day 20-mg/24-h continuous infusion (C 48).
RESULTS: For each of C LD, C 48, and AUC∞, the mean values were similar for subjects with mild hepatic impairment and subjects with normal hepatic function. Subjects with moderate hepatic impairment had a 73 % higher C 48 and an 80 % higher AUC∞ compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. There were no clinically relevant changes in conivaptan exposure in the mild and moderate renal impairment groups compared with subjects with normal renal function. Intravenous conivaptan was generally well tolerated in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment. Infusion-site reaction was the most commonly reported adverse event.
CONCLUSION: Overall exposure to conivaptan increased in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. Therefore, in patients with moderate hepatic impairment, conivaptan should be initiated with a loading dose of 10 mg over 30 min followed by 10 mg per day as a continuous infusion for 2-4 days, which is half the approved dose. No dose adjustment is necessary in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment and in patients with mild hepatic impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23456393     DOI: 10.1007/s40262-013-0047-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  14 in total

Review 1.  Liver function: test selection and interpretation of results.

Authors:  M Desmond Burke
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.935

Review 2.  How to respond to abnormal liver function tests.

Authors:  Jane Collier; Maggie Bassendine
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 3.  Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD.

Authors:  François Durand; Dominique Valla
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

Review 5.  Treatment of hyponatremia.

Authors:  Peter Gross
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 1.271

6.  Development of severe hyponatraemia in hospitalized patients: treatment-related risk factors and inadequate management.

Authors:  Ewout J Hoorn; Jan Lindemans; Robert Zietse
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 7.  Management of hyponatremia: providing treatment and avoiding harm.

Authors:  Chirag Vaidya; Warren Ho; Benjamin J Freda
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.321

8.  Hyponatremia in cirrhosis: Results of a patient population survey.

Authors:  Paolo Angeli; Florence Wong; Hugh Watson; Pere Ginès
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intravenous conivaptan in patients with euvolaemic hyponatraemia: subgroup analysis of a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Joseph G Verbalis; David Zeltser; Neila Smith; Abhijit Barve; Masakazu Andoh
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 10.  Diagnosis and management of hyponatremia in acute illness.

Authors:  Robert W Schrier; Shweta Bansal
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.687

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prediction of the Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of New Drugs.

Authors:  Elisa Borella; Italo Poggesi; Paolo Magni
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Sources of Interindividual Variability.

Authors:  Yvonne S Lin; Kenneth E Thummel; Brice D Thompson; Rheem A Totah; Christi W Cho
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Pharmacokinetics of conivaptan use in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Authors:  Thomas Marbury; Jerry Fox; Byron Kaelin; Leo Pavliv
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.162

4.  Systematic and quantitative assessment of the effect of chronic kidney disease on CYP2D6 and CYP3A4/5.

Authors:  K Yoshida; B Sun; L Zhang; P Zhao; D R Abernethy; T D Nolin; A Rostami-Hodjegan; I Zineh; S-M Huang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 6.875

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.