PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of different KRAS mutations on treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib in SW48 colorectal cancer cell line variants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Isogenic SW48 KRAS wt, G12A, G12C, G12D, G12R, G12S, G12 V, and G13D cells were evaluated for ERK phosphorylation with and without EGF stimulation. In addition, the respective cell lines were tested for the effect of sunitinib on ERK/ELK phosphorylation, cell cycle, and cytotoxicity. RESULTS: Compared to KRAS wt cells, all KRAS mutant variants were associated with resistance to sunitinib treatment. In the MTT chemosensitivity assay, the grade of resistance was less pronounced in G13D and highest in G12A, G12C, and G12S mutant cells. The reduction in ERK phosphorylation due to treatment with sunitinib was highest in G12V (89 %) mutant cells and lowest in G12A (24 %) mutant cells. ELK phosphorylation was less decreased in all KRAS mutant variants compared to KRAS wt cells following sunitinib treatment. The grade of resistance appears to correlate with the individual KRAS-dependent intrinsic activation of ERK. CONCLUSION: Our isogenic cell culture model suggests that KRAS mutations in SW48 colorectal cancer cells are linked to resistance to the multityrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. KRAS G13D mutant SW48 cells represented the KRAS subspecies with the lowest grade of resistance. Future studies will have to clarify whether KRAS can be used to guide sunitinib treatment or-in general-a treatment with a multityrosine kinase inhibitor in mCRC.
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of different KRAS mutations on treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib in SW48 colorectal cancer cell line variants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Isogenic SW48 KRAS wt, G12A, G12C, G12D, G12R, G12S, G12 V, and G13D cells were evaluated for ERK phosphorylation with and without EGF stimulation. In addition, the respective cell lines were tested for the effect of sunitinib on ERK/ELK phosphorylation, cell cycle, and cytotoxicity. RESULTS: Compared to KRAS wt cells, all KRAS mutant variants were associated with resistance to sunitinib treatment. In the MTT chemosensitivity assay, the grade of resistance was less pronounced in G13D and highest in G12A, G12C, and G12S mutant cells. The reduction in ERK phosphorylation due to treatment with sunitinib was highest in G12V (89 %) mutant cells and lowest in G12A (24 %) mutant cells. ELK phosphorylation was less decreased in all KRAS mutant variants compared to KRAS wt cells following sunitinib treatment. The grade of resistance appears to correlate with the individual KRAS-dependent intrinsic activation of ERK. CONCLUSION: Our isogenic cell culture model suggests that KRAS mutations in SW48 colorectal cancer cells are linked to resistance to the multityrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. KRASG13D mutant SW48 cells represented the KRAS subspecies with the lowest grade of resistance. Future studies will have to clarify whether KRAS can be used to guide sunitinib treatment or-in general-a treatment with a multityrosine kinase inhibitor in mCRC.
Authors: W S Samowitz; K Curtin; D Schaffer; M Robertson; M Leppert; M L Slattery Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Brian I Rini; Ronald M Bukowski; Brendan D Curti; Daniel J George; Gary R Hudes; Bruce G Redman; Kim A Margolin; Jaime R Merchan; George Wilding; Michelle S Ginsberg; Jennifer Bacik; Sindy T Kim; Charles M Baum; M Dror Michaelson Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-06-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Wendy De Roock; Derek J Jonker; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Dongsheng Tu; Salvatore Siena; Simona Lamba; Sabrina Arena; Milo Frattini; Hubert Piessevaux; Eric Van Cutsem; Chris J O'Callaghan; Shirin Khambata-Ford; John R Zalcberg; John Simes; Christos S Karapetis; Alberto Bardelli; Sabine Tejpar Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: K Szymańska; L E Moore; N Rothman; W H Chow; F Waldman; E Jaeger; T Waterboer; L Foretova; M Navratilova; V Janout; H Kollarova; D Zaridze; V Matveev; D Mates; N Szeszenia-Dabrowska; I Holcatova; V Bencko; F Le Calvez-Kelm; S Villar; M Pawlita; P Boffetta; P Hainaut; P Brennan Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2010-02-06 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Leonard B Saltz; Lee S Rosen; John L Marshall; Robert J Belt; Herbert I Hurwitz; S Gail Eckhardt; Emily K Bergsland; Daniel G Haller; A Craig Lockhart; Caio M Rocha Lima; Xin Huang; Samuel E DePrimo; Edna Chow-Maneval; Richard C Chao; Heinz J Lenz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Diána Brauswetter; Bianka Gurbi; Attila Varga; Edit Várkondi; Richárd Schwab; Gábor Bánhegyi; Orsolya Fábián; György Kéri; István Vályi-Nagy; István Peták Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 3.240