INTRODUCTION: The initially postulated superior neurocognitive effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics is currently under debate. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open-label study was carried out to compare the long-term neurocognitive effectiveness of haloperidol, olanzapine, and risperidone in the first episode of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A final sample of 79 patients randomized tohaloperidol (N = 28), olanzapine (N = 23), or risperidone (N = 28) who completed clinical and cognitive evaluations at baseline and 3-year follow-up was included in the final analysis. Forty-one healthy individuals were also included in the final analysis. The main outcome measure was cognitive changes at 3-year follow-up. Due to the fact that some of the patients had switched their initially prescribed antipsychotic medication during the course of the study (6 out of 28 in haloperidol group, 18 out of 23 in olanzapine group, and 24 out of 28 in risperidone group continued with the initial study drug at 3-year assessment), we have also conducted a per protocol analysis. RESULTS:Overall, cognitive changes were similar in the three treatment groups and controls, although a greater improvement in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Digit Symbol, and Iowa Gambling Test was found in the treatment groups. The better performance observed on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Digit Symbol in olanzapine treatment group was likely explained by the lower prevalence of use of antimuscarinic drugs. These results were essentially similar to those found in the intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The major conclusion of this study is that haloperidol, olanzapine, and risperidone have not demonstrated substantial neurocognitive effectiveness, improving cognitive deficits present in the early phases of the illness. The study also underscores the importance of exploring new drugs for the treatment of cognitive impairments and associated functional disabilities in schizophrenia.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The initially postulated superior neurocognitive effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics is currently under debate. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open-label study was carried out to compare the long-term neurocognitive effectiveness of haloperidol, olanzapine, and risperidone in the first episode of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A final sample of 79 patients randomized to haloperidol (N = 28), olanzapine (N = 23), or risperidone (N = 28) who completed clinical and cognitive evaluations at baseline and 3-year follow-up was included in the final analysis. Forty-one healthy individuals were also included in the final analysis. The main outcome measure was cognitive changes at 3-year follow-up. Due to the fact that some of the patients had switched their initially prescribed antipsychotic medication during the course of the study (6 out of 28 in haloperidol group, 18 out of 23 in olanzapine group, and 24 out of 28 in risperidone group continued with the initial study drug at 3-year assessment), we have also conducted a per protocol analysis. RESULTS: Overall, cognitive changes were similar in the three treatment groups and controls, although a greater improvement in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Digit Symbol, and Iowa Gambling Test was found in the treatment groups. The better performance observed on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Digit Symbol in olanzapine treatment group was likely explained by the lower prevalence of use of antimuscarinic drugs. These results were essentially similar to those found in the intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The major conclusion of this study is that haloperidol, olanzapine, and risperidone have not demonstrated substantial neurocognitive effectiveness, improving cognitive deficits present in the early phases of the illness. The study also underscores the importance of exploring new drugs for the treatment of cognitive impairments and associated functional disabilities in schizophrenia.
Authors: Robert W Buchanan; Julie Kreyenbuhl; Deanna L Kelly; Jason M Noel; Douglas L Boggs; Bernard A Fischer; Seth Himelhoch; Beverly Fang; Eunice Peterson; Patrick R Aquino; William Keller Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Dawn I Velligan; Peter J Weiden; Martha Sajatovic; Jan Scott; Daniel Carpenter; Ruth Ross; John P Docherty Journal: J Psychiatr Pract Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 1.325
Authors: Susan R McGurk; Michael F Green; William C Wirshing; Donna Ames Wirshing; Steven R Marder; Jim Mintz; Robert Kern Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Abraham Reichenberg; Philip D Harvey; Christopher R Bowie; Ramin Mojtabai; Jonathan Rabinowitz; Robert K Heaton; Evelyn Bromet Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Faith R Borgan; Sameer Jauhar; Robert A McCutcheon; Fiona S Pepper; Maria Rogdaki; David J Lythgoe; Oliver D Howes Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Hai Bo Haber Xue; Li Liu; Hena Zhang; William Montgomery; Tamás Treuer Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 2.570