BACKGROUND: Skeletal dysplasias are conditions of abnormal bone and cartilage growth resulting in short stature. Developing expertise in the radiographic evaluation of dysplasias can be difficult because more than 250 skeletal dysplasias have been described. Exhaustive description of individual dysplasias can be found in hard copy textbooks, without the ability to compare dysplasias side by side. OBJECTIVE: To provide radiographic images of several common skeletal dysplasias with comparative normal skeletal surveys, thus facilitating understanding of the terminology and differences in imaging appearances commonly encountered in interpreting dysplasias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images from skeletal surveys obtained at our institution from 2006 to 2010 were compiled and reviewed for best quality images. Selected surveys were divided into body parts. The software program used for viewing the atlas permits linked scrolling, resizing of images, and simultaneous comparison of cases. RESULTS: Radiographic images for 13 common skeletal dysplasias and 3 comparative normal skeletons (neonate, infant and child) are provided as an interactive digital atlas. CONCLUSION: The placement of images of several common skeletal dysplasias with descriptive text in an interactive and comparative format facilitates understanding of basic radiographic terminology and appearances. We describe the atlas and discuss skeletal survey interpretation.
BACKGROUND:Skeletal dysplasias are conditions of abnormal bone and cartilage growth resulting in short stature. Developing expertise in the radiographic evaluation of dysplasias can be difficult because more than 250 skeletal dysplasias have been described. Exhaustive description of individual dysplasias can be found in hard copy textbooks, without the ability to compare dysplasias side by side. OBJECTIVE: To provide radiographic images of several common skeletal dysplasias with comparative normal skeletal surveys, thus facilitating understanding of the terminology and differences in imaging appearances commonly encountered in interpreting dysplasias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images from skeletal surveys obtained at our institution from 2006 to 2010 were compiled and reviewed for best quality images. Selected surveys were divided into body parts. The software program used for viewing the atlas permits linked scrolling, resizing of images, and simultaneous comparison of cases. RESULTS: Radiographic images for 13 common skeletal dysplasias and 3 comparative normal skeletons (neonate, infant and child) are provided as an interactive digital atlas. CONCLUSION: The placement of images of several common skeletal dysplasias with descriptive text in an interactive and comparative format facilitates understanding of basic radiographic terminology and appearances. We describe the atlas and discuss skeletal survey interpretation.
Authors: Matthew L Warman; Valerie Cormier-Daire; Christine Hall; Deborah Krakow; Ralph Lachman; Martine LeMerrer; Geert Mortier; Stefan Mundlos; Gen Nishimura; David L Rimoin; Stephen Robertson; Ravi Savarirayan; David Sillence; Juergen Spranger; Sheila Unger; Bernhard Zabel; Andrea Superti-Furga Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Leslie Bosseler; Pieter Cornillie; Jimmy H Saunders; Jaco Bakker; Jan A M Langermans; Christophe Casteleyn; Annemie Decostere; Koen Chiers Journal: Comp Med Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 0.982