Literature DB >> 23454720

The case for a duty to research: not yet proven.

Iain Brassington.   

Abstract

In this commentary on 'Why participating in (certain) scientific research is a moral duty', I take issue with a number of Stjernschantz Forsberg et al's claims. Though abiding by the terms of a contract might be obligatory, this won't show that those terms themselves indicate a duty--even allowing that there's a contract to begin with. Meanwhile, though we might have reasons to participate, not all reasons are moral reasons, and the paper does not establish that the reasons here are moral in character.

Keywords:  Research Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23454720     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  Ethical Issues in Consent for the Reuse of Data in Health Data Platforms.

Authors:  Alex McKeown; Miranda Mourby; Paul Harrison; Sophie Walker; Mark Sheehan; Ilina Singh
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Child's objection to non-beneficial research: capacity and distress based models.

Authors:  Marcin Waligora; Joanna Różyńska; Jan Piasecki
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-03

3.  Research Translation and Emerging Health Technologies: Synthetic Biology and Beyond.

Authors:  Sarah Chan
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2018-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.