Literature DB >> 23454158

Renal function after laparoendoscopic single site pyeloplasty.

Brian R Harrow1, Aditya Bagrodia, Ephrem O Olweny, Stephen Faddegon, Jeffrey A Cadeddu, Jeffrey C Gahan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Outcomes after laparoendoscopic single site pyeloplasty are limited to small cohort studies with short-term followup. We evaluated the clinical and renal function outcomes of what to our knowledge is the largest laparoendoscopic single site pyeloplasty cohort to date with a mean followup of 12 months.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction who underwent robotic or conventional laparoendoscopic single site pyeloplasty were entered into the study. Patient demographics, and preoperative and postoperative renal function outcomes were recorded. Diuretic renogram was performed after stent removal, at 6 months and yearly thereafter.
RESULTS: The cohort included 31 conventional and 22 robotic laparoendoscopic single site pyeloplasties. Four laparoendoscopic single site surgeries (7.8%) were converted to another procedure due to failure to progress. Mean ± SD followup was 12.1 ± 10.7 months and 22 patients had at least 12 months of followup. No intraoperative complications occurred. Complications developed postoperatively in 11 patients (21%), of which 9 were Clavien grade 3 or greater. Preoperative symptoms resolved in 49 of 51 cases (96%). Severe obstruction (half-time greater than 20 minutes) was seen in 32 of 44 patients (73%) at presentation and obstruction resolved (half-time 20 minutes or less) in 41 (93%). Mean preoperative and postoperative half-time was 24.6 ± 13.4 and 8.3 ± 4.1 minutes, respectively, for an improvement of 16.3 ± 12.3 minutes (p <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoendoscopic single site pyeloplasty is safe and efficacious. The laparoscopic and robotic techniques provide excellent outcomes in terms of symptomatic relief and radiographic resolution of obstruction.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-LESS; CLP; DRG; LESS; R-LESS; T½; UPJO; conventional LESS; conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty; diuretic renogram; eGFR; estimated glomerular filtration rate; half-time; kidney; laparoendoscopic single site; laparoscopy; robotic LESS; robotics; treatment outcome; ureteral obstruction; ureteral pelvic junction obstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23454158     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  2 in total

1.  First Canadian experience with robotic single-incision pyeloplasty: Comparison with multi-incision technique.

Authors:  Jeffrey Law; Neal Rowe; Jason Archambault; Sofia Nastis; Alp Sener; Patrick P Luke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Laparoendoscopic single site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal pyeloplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Felipe Brandao; Humberto Laydner; Homayoun Zargar; Fabio Torricelli; Cassio Andreoni; Jihad Kaouk; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.