Literature DB >> 23454066

Nursing students' perceptions of high- and low-fidelity simulation used as learning methods.

Randi Tosterud1, Birgitta Hedelin, Marie Louise Hall-Lord.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Due to the increasing focus on simulation used in nursing education, there is a need to examine how the scenarios and different simulation methods used are perceived by students. The aim of this study was to examine nursing students' perceptions of scenarios played out in different simulation methods, and whether their educational level influenced their perception. The study had a quantitative, evaluative and comparative design. The sample consisted of baccalaureate nursing students (n = 86) within various educational levels. The students were randomly divided into groups. They solved a patient case adapted to their educational level by using a high-fidelity patient simulator, a static mannequin or a paper/pencil case study. Data were collected by three instruments developed by the National League for Nursing. The results showed that the nursing students reported satisfaction with the implementation of the scenarios regardless of the simulation methods used. The findings indicated that the students who used the paper/pencil case study were the most satisfied. Moreover, educational level did not seem to influence their perceptions.
CONCLUSIONS: Independent of educational level, the findings indicated that simulation with various degrees of fidelity could be used in nursing education. There is a need for further research to examine more closely the rationale behind the students' perception of the simulation methods.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23454066     DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2013.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract        ISSN: 1471-5953            Impact factor:   2.281


  8 in total

1.  Simulation experiences of paramedic students: a cross-cultural examination.

Authors:  Brett Williams; Chloe Abel; Eihab Khasawneh; Linda Ross; Tracy Levett-Jones
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2016-03-21

2.  Tensions in learning professional identities - nursing students' narratives and participation in practical skills during their clinical practice: an ethnographic study.

Authors:  Mona Ewertsson; Sangeeta Bagga-Gupta; Renée Allvin; Karin Blomberg
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2017-08-16

3.  Elements in scenario-based simulation associated with nursing students' self-confidence and satisfaction: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Camilla Olaussen; Kristin Heggdal; Christine Raaen Tvedt
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-09-27

4.  Nursing Students' Satisfaction: A Comparison between Medium- and High-Fidelity Simulation Training.

Authors:  Ana Rosa Alconero-Camarero; Carmen María Sarabia-Cobo; María José Catalán-Piris; Silvia González-Gómez; José Rafael González-López
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Efficacy of Simulation Using NLN/Jeffries Nursing Education Simulation Framework on Satisfaction and Self-Confidence of Undergraduate Nursing Students in a Middle-Eastern Country.

Authors:  Esra Al Khasawneh; Judie Arulappan; Jansi Rani Natarajan; Savithri Raman; Chandrani Isac
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2021-04-20

6.  Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junghee Kim; Jin-Hwa Park; Sujin Shin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Training Nursing Skills: A Quantitative Study of Nursing Students' Experiences before and after Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Elisabeth Solvik; Solveig Struksnes
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2018-03-11

8.  Objective and Subjective Stress Parameters in Response to High and Low-Fidelity Simulation Activities.

Authors:  Marta Czekirda; Patrycja Misztal-Okońska; Anna Włoszczak-Szubzda; Mariusz Goniewicz; Mateusz Cybulski; Krystyna Kowalczuk; Noemi Jaszyna; Maria Pyć; Mariusz Gnat; Joanna Girzelska; Ewa Guz; Mariusz Sutryk; Wioletta Tuszyńska-Bogucka; Krzysztof Goniewicz; Ahmed M Al-Wathinani; Amir Khorram-Manesh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.