Literature DB >> 23453832

Reprint of "Affective picture processing as a function of preceding picture valence: an ERP analysis".

Harald T Schupp1, Ralf Schmälzle, Tobias Flaisch, Almut I Weike, Alfons O Hamm.   

Abstract

Event-related brain potential (ERP) studies consistently revealed that a relatively early (early posterior negativity; EPN) and a late (late positive potential; LPP) ERP component differentiate between emotional and neutral picture stimuli. Two studies examined the processing of emotional stimuli when preceded either by pleasant, neutral, or unpleasant context images. In both studies, distinct streams of six pictures were shown. In Study 1, hedonic context was alternated randomly across the 180 picture streams. In Study 2, hedonic context sequences were blocked, resulting in 60 preceding sequences of pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant context valence, respectively. The main finding was that the valence of the preceding picture sequence had no significant effect on the emotional modulation of the EPN and LPP components. However, previous results were replicated in that emotional stimulus processing was associated with larger EPN and LPP components as compared to neutral pictures. These findings suggest that the prioritized processing of emotional stimuli is primarily driven by the valence of the current picture.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Year:  2013        PMID: 23453832     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  8 in total

1.  Using ERPs to investigate valence processing in the affect misattribution procedure.

Authors:  Curtis D Von Gunten; Bruce D Bartholow; Laura D Scherer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  It's all in the past: temporal-context effects modulate subjective evaluations of emotional visual stimuli, regardless of presentation sequence.

Authors:  Kristína Czekóová; Daniel J Shaw; Eva Janoušová; Tomáš Urbánek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-07

3.  Subliminal Emotional Words Impact Syntactic Processing: Evidence from Performance and Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Laura Jiménez-Ortega; Javier Espuny; Pilar Herreros de Tejada; Carolina Vargas-Rivero; Manuel Martín-Loeches
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception.

Authors:  Michiel Spapé; Ville Harjunen; Imtiaj Ahmed; Giulio Jacucci; Niklas Ravaja
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Behavioral and EEG Measures Show no Amplifying Effects of Shared Attention on Attention or Memory.

Authors:  Noam Mairon; Mor Nahum; Arjen Stolk; Robert T Knight; Anat Perry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The role of selective attention in the positivity offset: Evidence from event related potentials.

Authors:  Regard M Booy; Patrick L Carolan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Automatic but Flexible and Content-Dependent Nature of Syntax.

Authors:  Laura Jiménez-Ortega; Esperanza Badaya; Pilar Casado; Sabela Fondevila; David Hernández-Gutiérrez; Francisco Muñoz; José Sánchez-García; Manuel Martín-Loeches
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Local context influences memory for emotional stimuli but not electrophysiological markers of emotion-dependent attention.

Authors:  Gemma E Barnacle; Dimitris Tsivilis; Alexandre Schaefer; Deborah Talmi
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.016

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.