Literature DB >> 23453699

A systematic review of factors influencing uptake of invasive fetal genetic testing by pregnant women of advanced maternal age.

Lea Godino1, Daniela Turchetti, Heather Skirton.   

Abstract

Women of advanced maternal age have a higher risk of having a child affected by a chromosomal disorder than younger childbearing women and are frequently offered invasive testing during pregnancy. The aim of our systematic review was to identify and analyse the current evidence base regarding factors that influence the uptake of invasive fetal testing by pregnant women of advanced maternal age. We conducted a systematic review. A search of The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase and Medline databases was undertaken for papers published in English and Italian from January 2002 to May 2012. Eleven studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, were subjected to quality assessment and included in the review. We analysed the data using thematic analysis. The factors influencing women were classified as either external or psychosocial factors. External factors included the opportunity for screening, screening results and use of genetic counselling. Psychosocial factors related to ethnicity, socio-demographic status and attendance of partners during counselling. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions as to the principle factors that influence uptake of invasive tests by women of AMA. More research is needed to enhance understanding of relevant factors to ensure that services are offered in a way that acknowledges practical as well as psychosocial influences. This type of research will help to equip midwives and other professionals caring for women during pregnancy to ensure that women are supported to make the choices that are appropriate for them and their families.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced maternal age; Down syndrome; Invasive test; Prenatal test

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23453699     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  6 in total

1.  Attitudes of women of advanced maternal age undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis and the impact of genetic counselling.

Authors:  Lea Godino; Eva Pompilii; Federica D'Anna; Antonio M Morselli-Labate; Elena Nardi; Marco Seri; Nicola Rizzo; Gianluigi Pilu; Daniela Turchetti
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal Down syndrome screening results: it is all about the age.

Authors:  Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Talya Miron-Shatz; Liat Ries-Levavi; Elon Pras
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Considering medical risk information and communicating values: A mixed-method study of women's choice in prenatal testing.

Authors:  An Chen; Henni Tenhunen; Paulus Torkki; Seppo Heinonen; Paul Lillrank; Vedran Stefanovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Knowledge of Prenatal Screening, Down Syndrome, Amniocentesis, and Related Factors among Iranian Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Maryam Rabiee; Zahra Jouhari; Ashraf Pirasteh
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2019-04

Review 5.  Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review.

Authors:  Valentina Di Mattei; Federica Ferrari; Gaia Perego; Valentina Tobia; Fabio Mauro; Massimo Candiani
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2021-01-13

6.  Factors associated with utilization of maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in mainland China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chuanlin Li; Leiyu Shi; Jiayan Huang; Xu Qian; Yingyao Chen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.