Literature DB >> 23453514

A phenotype-genotype correlation study of X-linked retinoschisis.

Ajoy Vincent1, Anthony G Robson, Magella M Neveu, Genevieve A Wright, Anthony T Moore, Andrew R Webster, Graham E Holder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical phenotype and detailed electroretinographic parameters in X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS).
DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-seven patients (aged 1-67 years) with molecularly confirmed XLRS were clinically ascertained.
METHODS: Pattern electroretinography (PERG) and full-field electroretinography (ERG), incorporating international standard recordings, were performed in 44 cases. Thirteen patients, mostly pediatric, were tested using a simplified ERG protocol. On-Off and S-cone ERGs were performed in most adults. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were available in 17 and 21 cases, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The clinical and electrophysiologic data associated with different types of mutation in the RS1 gene.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients had missense changes (group A), and 14 patients had nonsense, splice-site, or frame-shifting mutations in the RS1 gene (group B). The mean best-corrected visual acuity was better in group A than in group B (0.34 and 0.21, respectively). Fundus examination revealed foveal schisis in approximately half of both groups. The bright-flash dark-adapted (DA) ERG (11.0 candela.sec.m(-2)) waveform was electronegative in 62% of group A eyes and 100% of group B eyes. The photopic 30-Hz flicker ERG was delayed in all group B eyes and all except 6 group A eyes. On-Off ERG b-waves were subnormal in 39% of group A and 89% of group B eyes; d-waves were delayed in 14 eyes (group A = 10, group B = 4). S-cone ERGs were abnormal in 50% of both groups. The PERG was abnormal in 88% of group A and 100% of group B eyes. A spoke-wheel pattern of high and low intensity was the most common FAF abnormality observed. The OCT showed intraretinal schitic cavities in the majority of eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: There is profound phenotypic variability in patients with XLRS. Most patients have DA bright-flash ERGs with a low b:a ratio in keeping with inner retinal dysfunction. Generalized cone system dysfunction is common and associated with an abnormal On-response and less frequent additional Off-response involvement. Nonsense, splice-site, or frame-shifting mutations in RS1 consistently caused electronegative bright-flash ERG, delayed flicker response, and abnormal PERG; missense mutations result in a wider range of ERG abnormalities.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23453514     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  29 in total

1.  A novel deletion mutation in RS1 gene caused X-linked juvenile retinoschisis in a Chinese family.

Authors:  Y Huang; L Mei; B Gui; W Su; D Liang; L Wu; Q Pan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Convergence of Human Genetics and Animal Studies: Gene Therapy for X-Linked Retinoschisis.

Authors:  Ronald A Bush; Lisa L Wei; Paul A Sieving
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  X-linked juvenile retinoschisis: phenotypic and genetic characterization.

Authors:  Rasa Strupaitė; Laima Ambrozaitytė; Loreta Cimbalistienė; Rimvydas Ašoklis; Algirdas Utkus
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Differentiation of murine models of "negative ERG" by single and repetitive light stimuli.

Authors:  Naoyuki Tanimoto; James D Akula; Anne B Fulton; Bernhard H F Weber; Mathias W Seeliger
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Molecular modeling indicates distinct classes of missense variants with mild and severe XLRS phenotypes.

Authors:  Yuri V Sergeev; Susan Vitale; Paul A Sieving; Ajoy Vincent; Anthony G Robson; Anthony T Moore; Andrew R Webster; Graham E Holder
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Test-Retest Intervisit Variability of Functional and Structural Parameters in X-Linked Retinoschisis.

Authors:  Brett G Jeffrey; Catherine A Cukras; Susan Vitale; Amy Turriff; Kristin Bowles; Paul A Sieving
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Clinical presentations of X-linked retinoschisis in Taiwanese patients confirmed with genetic sequencing.

Authors:  Nan-Kai Wang; Laura Liu; Ho-Min Chen; Shawn Tsai; Tsong-Chi Chang; Tzu-Hsun Tsai; Chung-May Yang; An-Ning Chao; Kuan-Jen Chen; Ling-Yuh Kao; Ling Yeung; Lung-Kun Yeh; Yih-Shiou Hwang; Wei-Chi Wu; Chi-Chun Lai
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  Novel mutations of the RS1 gene in a cohort of Chinese families with X-linked retinoschisis.

Authors:  Jieqiong Chen; Ke Xu; Xiaohui Zhang; Zhe Pan; Bing Dong; Yang Li
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.367

9.  X-Linked Retinoschisis: Phenotypic Variability in a Chinese Family.

Authors:  Yangyan Xiao; Xiao Liu; Luosheng Tang; Xia Wang; Terry G Coursey; Terry Coursy; Xiaojian Guo; Zhuo Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Phenotypic characterization of X-linked retinoschisis: Clinical, electroretinography, and optical coherence tomography variables.

Authors:  Srividya Neriyanuri; Sudha Dhandayuthapani; Jayamuruga Pandian Arunachalam; Rajiv Raman
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.