Effectiveness of cast immobilization in comparison to the gold-standard self-removal orthotic intervention for closed mallet fingers: a randomized clinical trial.

STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.
INTRODUCTION: Although orthotic immobilization has become the preferable treatment choice for closed mallet injuries, it is unclear whether orthosis self-removal has an impact on the final outcome.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment efficacy of cast immobilization of closed mallet fingers using Quickcast(®) (QC) compared to a removable, lever-type thermoplastic orthosis (LTTP).
METHODS: 57 subjects were randomized in 2 groups. DIPj extensor lag and the Gaberman success scale were used as primary outcomes.
RESULTS: LTTP subjects resulted in greater extensor lag than QC subjects (x = 5°; p = 0.05) at 12 weeks from baseline, and high edema and older age negatively affected DIPj extensor lag. No other differences were found between groups.
CONCLUSION: Cast immobilization seems to be slightly more effective than the traditional approach probably for its greater capacity to reduce edema. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1B.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes