| Literature DB >> 23453043 |
Hai-Ying Kong1, Fen Chen, Yong He, Lin-Jiao Wu, Li-Qing Wang, Sheng-Mei Zhu, Shu-Sen Zheng.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT) and associated with a high mortality. The renal resistive index (RI) is used to assess early renal function impairment in critical care patients. However, limited data are available concerning changes of renal RI and the development of AKI early after reperfusion. We approached to investigate the changes of renal RI and AKI after reperfusion in a rat liver transplantation model.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23453043 PMCID: PMC3599562 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-55
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Hemodynamic variables of the two groups during the different phases of liver transplantation
| MAP(mmHg) | ||||||
| Sham group | 80 ± 6.3 | 79 ± 6 | 82 ± 6.4 | 81 ± 6.1 | 80 ± 6.2 | 83 ± 6 |
| LT group | 83 ± 6.5 | 54 ± 4.8* | 64 ± 5.2* | 66 ± 5.5* | 68 ± 6.3* | 76 ± 7.1 |
| HR(bpm) | ||||||
| Sham group | 80 ± 7.5 | 82 ± 9.3 | 84 ± 9.0 | 82 ± 8.1 | 80 ± 8.7 | 81 ± 9.5 |
| LT group | 81 ± 6.3 | 114 ± 11.2* | 98 ± 10.6* | 94 ± 9.8* | 90 ± 8.5* | 93 ± 9.6* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. *: P < 0.05, vs. sham group.
Sham: sham operating; LT: liver transplantation. BL: baseline; C5: 5 min after portal vein clamping; R5, R15, R30, R120: 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 120 min after reperfusion.
Figure 1The right intrarenal RI recorded 10 min after portal vein and IVC clamping (A); The right intrarenal RI recorded 10 min after reperfusion in the recipient in the LT group (B). Renal RI recorded in the anhepatic stage and early after reperfusion (C); arterial velocity recorded in the anhepatic stage and early after reperfusion (D). Results are expressed as mean ± SD. *: P < 0.05, vs. sham group. BL: baseline; C5: 5 min after portal vein clamping, C10: 10 min after portal vein and IVC clamping; R5, R10, R15, R20, R30: 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 20 min, 30 min after reperfusion; SVP: peak arterial systolic velocity.
Comparison of liver function and renal function 30 min, 2 h after reperfusion in the two groups
| ALT(U/L) | ||
| Sham group | 25.2 ± 10.1 | 26.1 ± 9.8 |
| LT group | 317.56 ± 106.24* | 405 ± 108.07* |
| AST(U/L) | ||
| Sham group | 45.6 ± 10.4 | 47.2 ± 9.8 |
| LT group | 412 ± 109.12* | 846.13 ± 213.51* |
| sCr(mg/dL) | ||
| Sham group | 7.4 ± 2.3 | 8.2 ± 2.5 |
| LT group | 36.1 ± 13.2* | 34.7 ± 11.2* |
| NGAL(mg/L) | ||
| Sham group | 0.83 ± 0.11 | 0.91 ± 0.15 |
| LT group | 1.53 ± 0.37* | 1.72 ± 0.39* |
| Cys(mg/L) | ||
| Sham group | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.02 |
| LT group | 1.32 ± 0.33* | 1.18 ± 0.46* |
| FENa(%) | ||
| Sham group | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.31 ± 0.05 |
| LT group | 1.22 ± 0.14* | 1.28 ± 0.12* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. *: P < 0.05, vs. sham group.
Sham: sham operating; LT: liver transplantation.
Figure 2Histological evaluation of renal tissue obtained 2 h after reperfusion. A hemotoxylin-eosin stain of kidney sections in the two groups(A- sham group, B- LT group); (C) Semiquantitative scoring of histological injury (n = 10). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD *: P < 0.05, vs. sham group. Magnification: 20×.