Literature DB >> 23452554

Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to uterine artery embolization.

Pratik Shukla1, Saurin P Sanghvi, Valdis M Lelkes, Abhishek Kumar, Sohail Contractor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the readability of Internet-based patient education materials (IPEMs) created by United States hospitals and universities and clinical practices and miscellaneous health care-associated Web sites regarding uterine artery embolization (UAE) as a marker for IPEMs in general. METHODS AND METHODS: Two hundred unique Web sites were evaluated for patient-related articles on UAE. Web sites produced by US hospitals and universities and clinical practices, as well as miscellaneous health care-associated Web sites meeting the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct criteria were included in the database. By using mathematical regression algorithms based on word and sentence length to quantitatively analyze reading materials for language intricacy, readability of 40 UAE-related IPEMs was assessed with four indices: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook (GFOG). Scores were evaluated against national recommendations, and intergroup analysis was performed.
RESULTS: None of the IPEMs were written at or below the sixth-grade reading level, based on FKGL. The mean readability scores were as follows: FRES, 43.98; FKGL, 10.76; SMOG, 13.63; and GFOG, 14.55. These scores indicate that the readability of UAE IPEMs is written at an advanced level, significantly above the recommended 6th grade reading level (P<.05) determined by the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
CONCLUSIONS: IPEMs related to UAE generated by hospitals, clinical practices, and miscellaneous health care-associated Web sites are written above the recommended sixth grade level. IPEMs for other disease entities may also reflect similar results.
Copyright © 2013 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23452554     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  3 in total

1.  Readability of American online patient education materials in urologic oncology: a need for simple communication.

Authors:  Amanda Pruthi; Matthew E Nielsen; Mathew C Raynor; Michael E Woods; Eric M Wallen; Angela B Smith
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Readability of Online Patient Educational Resources Found on NCI-Designated Cancer Center Web Sites.

Authors:  Stephen A Rosenberg; David Francis; Craig R Hullett; Zachary S Morris; Michael M Fisher; Jeffrey V Brower; Kristin A Bradley; Bethany M Anderson; Michael F Bassetti; Randall J Kimple
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 3.  The impact of health literacy in the care of surgical patients: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Gildasio S De Oliveira; Robert J McCarthy; Michael S Wolf; Jane Holl
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.