Literature DB >> 2345211

Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations.

D C Dilley1, W F Vann, T R Oldenburg, R M Crisp.   

Abstract

This study was designed to develop an indirect method for measuring the time required for restoration placement; and to compare the operator time required for placement of amalgam and composite resins in posterior teeth in children. Forty children, aged seven to nine years old, were selected to participate. Either amalgam or an experimental resin was used to restore the primary and permanent molars. All restorations and sealants were completed under the rubber dam. Each restorative appointment was videotaped with a color video camera mounted on the ceiling. Ninety-six restorative procedures were reviewed and evaluated for the amount of time necessary to accomplish them. The Class I permanent molar composite restoration required 35 percent more insertion and finishing time than did the amalgam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2345211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child        ISSN: 1945-1954


  6 in total

1.  Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided.

Authors:  Erinne B Lubisich; Thomas J Hilton; Jack L Ferracane; Hristina I Pashova; Bruce Burton
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Stamp Approach for Posterior Composite Restorations: A Case Report.

Authors:  Paridhi Agrawal; Pradnya Nikhade
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-05

3.  Direct and indirect stamp techniques for composite restorations - Sealing the uniqueness of a tooth: A case series.

Authors:  P Karunakar; M S Ranga Reddy; B Sravan Kumar; Rayapati Namratha
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-06-13

Review 4.  Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.

Authors:  Helen V Worthington; Sara Khangura; Kelsey Seal; Monika Mierzwinski-Urban; Analia Veitz-Keenan; Philipp Sahrmann; Patrick Roger Schmidlin; Dell Davis; Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor; María Graciela Rasines Alcaraz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-13

5.  A quantitative assessment of silicone and PTFE-based stamp techniques for restoring occlusal anatomy using resin-based composites.

Authors:  Christian Klein; Christiane von Ohle; Diana Wolff; Christian Meller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  The stamp technique for direct Class II composite restorations: A case series.

Authors:  Saaid Ayesh Alshehadat; Mohamad Syahrizal Halim; Koh Carmen; Chew Shi Fung
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.