Literature DB >> 23451840

Familial colorectal cancer risk assessment needs improvement for more effective cancer prevention in relatives.

N Dekker1, R P M G Hermens, F M Nagengast, W A G van Zelst-Stams, N Hoogerbrugge.   

Abstract

AIM: Twelve to thirty % of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and relatives with an increased familial risk of CRC are referred for preventive measures. New guidelines recommend genetic counselling for high-risk families and surveillance colonoscopy for moderate-risk families. Assessment of familial risk of CRC and referral rates for these preventive measures were determined 1 year after the introduction of new guidelines.
METHOD: Assessment of familial risk of CRC and referral for preventive measures were measured in clinical practice among 358 patients with CRC in 18 hospitals using medical records and questionnaires. Additionally, a knowledge survey was performed among 312 clinicians.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven % of patients with an increased familial risk (n = 65/97) were referred for preventive measures, as were 23% (61/261) of low-risk patients. The uptake of genetic counselling in high-risk families was 33% (12/36). The uptake of surveillance colonoscopy in moderate-risk families was 34% (21/61). In the knowledge survey clinicians correctly determined familial risk in 55% and preventive measures in 65% of cases.
CONCLUSION: Currently 67% of individuals with an increased familial risk of CRC were referred for preventive measures. Only one-third were referred in accordance with guidelines.
© 2013 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23451840     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  9 in total

1.  Quality of cancer family history and referral for genetic counseling and testing among oncology practices: a pilot test of quality measures as part of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

Authors:  Marie E Wood; Pamela Kadlubek; Trang H Pham; Dana S Wollins; Karen H Lu; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Michael N Neuss; Kevin S Hughes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Validation of an online questionnaire for identifying people at risk of familial and hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F G J Kallenberg; J E G IJspeert; P M M Bossuyt; C M Aalfs; E Dekker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Gatekeeper role of gastroenterologists and surgeons in recognising and discussing familial colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten F L Douma; Evelien Dekker; Ellen M A Smets; Cora M Aalfs
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  An E-Learning Module to Improve Nongenetic Health Professionals' Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Genetic Risk: Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Kirsten Freya Lea Douma; Cora M Aalfs; Evelien Dekker; Pieter J Tanis; Ellen M Smets
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-18

5.  Evaluation of an online family history tool for identifying hereditary and familial colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F G J Kallenberg; C M Aalfs; F O The; C A Wientjes; A C Depla; M W Mundt; P M M Bossuyt; E Dekker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Public support for healthcare-mediated disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information: Results from a population-based survey in Sweden.

Authors:  Andreas Andersson; Carolina Hawranek; Anna Öfverholm; Hans Ehrencrona; Kalle Grill; Senada Hajdarevic; Beatrice Melin; Emma Tham; Barbro Numan Hellquist; Anna Rosén
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.857

7.  Identification of familial colorectal cancer and hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes through the Dutch population-screening program: results ofa pilot study.

Authors:  Sanne J H van Erp; Laura W Leicher; Simone D Hennink; Zeinab Ghorbanoghli; Simone A C Breg; Hans Morreau; Maartje Nielsen; James C H Hardwick; Jan A Roukema; Alexandra M J Langers; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Hans F A Vasen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Referral to cancer genetic counseling: do migrant status and patients' educational background matter?

Authors:  J A M van der Giessen; E van Riel; M E Velthuizen; A M van Dulmen; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-09-04

9.  Boosting care and knowledge about hereditary cancer: European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes.

Authors:  Janet R Vos; Lisette Giepmans; Claas Röhl; Nicoline Geverink; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.375

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.