Literature DB >> 23451455

Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging for knee injury and clinical application for the Naresuan University Hospital.

Artit Laoruengthana1, Atthakorn Jarusriwanna.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of MRI evaluation for the traumatic knee injury may help the physician selecting the treatment options and informing patient about the prognosis. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the result of the MRI reported from a center in Phitsanulok which would be valuable for orthopaedic surgeons who practicing in the lower northern region of Thailand. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: The 1.5 Tesla MRI of 51 injured knees that underwent subsequent arthroscopic knee surgery was independently reviewed by one from the group of radiologists. The sensitivity, specificity accuracy and negative predictive value of the MRI evaluation for menisci and cruciate ligament pathology compared to the arthroscopic finding is determined.
RESULTS: There were 50 patients with the mean age of 36.7 year old (ranging from 18-75 years) and 30 were males and 20 were females. The sensitivity, specificity accuracy and negative predictive value (NPV) in detecting the complete tear of the ACL injury were 90.9%, 84.6%, 88.6% and 84.6%, respectively. There were 100%, 97.1%, 97.5% and 100%, respectively, for diagnosis of complete PCL tear. The MRI evaluation for definite medial meniscus tear revealed 100% in sensitivity, 52.6% in specificity, 64% in accuracy and 100% in NPV. For the lateral meniscus, it yielded 55.6%, 83.3%, 75.8% and 83.3%, respectively. Among the 22 patients who underwent the ACL reconstruction without the PCL or collateral ligament injury, there was 50% of associated meniscal injury with similar ratio between medial and lateral side.
CONCLUSION: The MRI report from the center in Phitsanulok could be useful in detecting the cruciate ligament tear particularly with uncertain clinical examination. With a high negative predictive value, the MRI could be used as a negative diagnostic tool for the meniscal injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23451455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai        ISSN: 0125-2208


  6 in total

1.  MRI analysis of tibial PCL attachment in a large population of adult patients: reference data for anatomic PCL reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuanjun Teng; Laiwei Guo; Meng Wu; Tianen Xu; Lianggong Zhao; Jin Jiang; Xiaoyun Sheng; Lihu Xu; Bo Zhang; Ning Ding; Yayi Xia
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 2.  Isolated posterior cruciate ligament tears: an update of management.

Authors:  Alfonso Vaquero-Picado; E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-04-27

3.  Risks and Complications Associated With Intra-articular Arthroscopy of the Knee and Shoulder in an Office Setting.

Authors:  Sean McMillan; Anikar Chhabra; Jeffrey D Hassebrock; Elizabeth Ford; Nirav H Amin
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-09-27

4.  UTE-T2* versus conventional T2* mapping to assess posterior cruciate ligament ultrastructure and integrity-an in-situ study.

Authors:  Lena Marie Wilms; Karl Ludger Radke; David Latz; Thomas Andreas Thiel; Miriam Frenken; Benedikt Kamp; Timm Joachim Filler; Armin Michael Nagel; Anja Müller-Lutz; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Sven Nebelung
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-08

5.  Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) synthetic graft for PCL reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Andrea Pintore; Gianluca Vecchio; Francesco Oliva; Frank Hildebrand; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 5.841

6.  The MRI posterior drawer test to assess posterior cruciate ligament functionality and knee joint laxity.

Authors:  Lena Marie Wollschläger; Karl Ludger Radke; Justus Schock; Niklas Kotowski; David Latz; Dominika Kanschik; Timm Joachim Filler; Svenja Caspers; Gerald Antoch; Joachim Windolf; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Sven Nebelung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.