Literature DB >> 23450766

Precarious employment, psychosocial working conditions, and health: Cross-sectional associations in a population-based sample of working Australians.

Dominic Keuskamp1, Anna M Ziersch, Fran E Baum, Anthony D Lamontagne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Precarious employment has been associated with poor health, but the potential mechanisms are unclear. We examined the relationships between precarious employment and health, and investigated psychosocial working conditions as potential mediators.
METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based survey was conducted in South Australia in 2009 (N = 1,016 employed). SF-12 measures of mental and physical health were modeled using logistic regression in relation to employment arrangement, controlling for socio-demographics, years in job and psychosocial working conditions.
RESULTS: There was no association between casual full-time or part-time employment and poor mental health in multivariate analyses. Conversely, there was a significant association between casual full-time employment and poor physical health (compared to permanent full-time workers, OR = 3.14, 95% CI 1.26-7.85). The association with physical health was unaffected by adjustment for psychosocial working conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Casual full-time employment was strongly associated with poor physical health but not with poor mental health. This association was not mediated by the psychosocial working conditions measured in this study, but may be related to other (unmeasured) working conditions.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  casual; employment; health; precarious; psychosocial

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23450766     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  5 in total

1.  Using Three Cross-Sectional Surveys to Compare Workplace Psychosocial Stressors and Associated Mental Health Status in Six Migrant Groups Working in Australia Compared with Australian-Born Workers.

Authors:  Alison Daly; Renee N Carey; Ellie Darcey; HuiJun Chih; Anthony D LaMontagne; Allison Milner; Alison Reid
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  The Relation Between Precarious Employment Arrangements and Social Precarity: Findings from the PREMIS Study in Stockholm, Sweden.

Authors:  Nuria Matilla-Santander; Johanna Jonsson; Bertina Kreshpaj; Cecilia Orellana; Joan Benach; Kathryn Badarin; Bo Burström; Alejandra Vives; Katarina Kjellberg; Susanne Strömdahl; Gun Johansson; Per-Olof Östergren; Theo Bodin
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 1.663

3.  Employment status and perceived health condition: longitudinal data from Italy.

Authors:  Liliana Minelli; Claudia Pigini; Manuela Chiavarini; Francesco Bartolucci
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Association between employment status and self-rated health: Korean working conditions survey.

Authors:  Kimin Kwon; Jae Bum Park; Kyung-Jong Lee; Yoon-Sik Cho
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-09-08

5.  Examining the Impact of Two Dimensions of Precarious Employment, Vulnerability and Insecurity on the Self-Reported Health of Men, Women and Migrants in Australia.

Authors:  Alison Daly; Marc B Schenker; Elena Ronda-Perez; Alison Reid
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.